| Why FIVE years? 09:37 - Feb 27 with 2640 views | SamWhiteUK |
I get that Evans wanted to show that he had faith in Lambert and the long-term plan, but where in the hell did the number five come from? That must be one of the longest contracts ever signed at this level of football. Why not a 2 or 3 year deal, with extensions?
If Evans has to cut it short, which he really should do, he would look a lot less of a pillock, and lose less money, if it were only 2 years early as opposed to 4.
Maybe a five year deal is linked to the five year plan, which I'm not convinced we've ever left year one of. |  | | |  |
| Why FIVE years? on 09:40 - Feb 27 with 2617 views | hatch |
I get topic deja vu on here.
I feel like we have spent most of this year reading threads on broadly the same 3 or 4 topics. |  | | |
| Why FIVE years? on 09:40 - Feb 27 with 2617 views | Guthrum |
Much like the Soviets, he likes a Five Year Plan. |  |
| |
| Why FIVE years? on 09:53 - Feb 27 with 2574 views | homer_123 |
| Why FIVE years? on 09:40 - Feb 27 by Guthrum |
Much like the Soviets, he likes a Five Year Plan. |
[OUCH!] |  |
| |
| Why FIVE years? on 12:55 - Feb 27 with 2500 views | LB27 |
It really is one of the worlds greatest mysteries... |  | | |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:21 - Feb 27 with 2461 views | BigManBlue |
| Why FIVE years? on 09:40 - Feb 27 by Guthrum |
Much like the Soviets, he likes a Five Year Plan. |
And much like the USSR we'll accomplish it 18 months early, then realise that everything we've produced was terrible quality... |  |
| |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:23 - Feb 27 with 2453 views | braveblue |
Incompetence. Like the rest of his tenure. |  | | |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:35 - Feb 27 with 2432 views | No9 |
maybe the 5 year plan is a standard introduce by Sheepshanks? | | | |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:37 - Feb 27 with 2431 views | Herbivore |
We don't have a 5 year plan do we? I think we did under Roy or Jewell or maybe Mick, but pretty sure it's now just a 5 point plan. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Why FIVE years? on 13:39 - Feb 27 with 2424 views | PhilTWTD |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:37 - Feb 27 by Herbivore |
We don't have a 5 year plan do we? I think we did under Roy or Jewell or maybe Mick, but pretty sure it's now just a 5 point plan. |
Five-year plan was under Burley. As you say, was a five-point plan which was announced a couple of years back. |  | | |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:39 - Feb 27 with 2420 views | footers |
| Why FIVE years? on 09:40 - Feb 27 by Guthrum |
Much like the Soviets, he likes a Five Year Plan. |
Is that why we signed Tito Nsiala? |  |
| |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:40 - Feb 27 with 2412 views | evansblue |
I told my mates off back in the day for running on the pitch and joining in the Duncan out demo.
I stuck up for Mick until I was blue in the face. I know it was dull football but his hands were tied. I also appreciate after Norwich away there was no going back. I thought Hurst could have had a bit longer. After five years of MM it was always going to take time.
BUT, Lambert is the most clueless and useless manager in my time supporting Ipswich. We were 3 points off 4th bottom when he joined, he has had three transfer windows, he works with them every day on the training ground and we are a shambles. I have never wanted a manager out but I want him gone ASAP. He has got away lightly and the minute anyone questions him he gets all aggressive. The bloke got a £3m pay off from Villa so he doesn't need the cash. Get someone new in, anyone. Someone for whom this job means something. someone with a plan and someone who cares. |  | | |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:45 - Feb 27 with 2388 views | No9 |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:40 - Feb 27 by evansblue |
I told my mates off back in the day for running on the pitch and joining in the Duncan out demo.
I stuck up for Mick until I was blue in the face. I know it was dull football but his hands were tied. I also appreciate after Norwich away there was no going back. I thought Hurst could have had a bit longer. After five years of MM it was always going to take time.
BUT, Lambert is the most clueless and useless manager in my time supporting Ipswich. We were 3 points off 4th bottom when he joined, he has had three transfer windows, he works with them every day on the training ground and we are a shambles. I have never wanted a manager out but I want him gone ASAP. He has got away lightly and the minute anyone questions him he gets all aggressive. The bloke got a £3m pay off from Villa so he doesn't need the cash. Get someone new in, anyone. Someone for whom this job means something. someone with a plan and someone who cares. |
So to put into perspective; At ITFC-
John Duncan win record = 45.3%
Mick McCarthy win record = 37.6% | | | |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:48 - Feb 27 with 2373 views | Herbivore |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:45 - Feb 27 by No9 |
So to put into perspective; At ITFC-
John Duncan win record = 45.3%
Mick McCarthy win record = 37.6% |
You need help. | |
| |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:48 - Feb 27 with 2371 views | BigManBlue |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:45 - Feb 27 by No9 |
So to put into perspective; At ITFC-
John Duncan win record = 45.3%
Mick McCarthy win record = 37.6% |
And according to trusty wikipedia Lambert is on 28%, which is the real issue I assume? | |
| |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:49 - Feb 27 with 2371 views | evansblue |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:45 - Feb 27 by No9 |
So to put into perspective; At ITFC-
John Duncan win record = 45.3%
Mick McCarthy win record = 37.6% |
What's Lamberts I haven't seen it ? | | | |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:56 - Feb 27 with 2353 views | evansblue |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:48 - Feb 27 by BigManBlue |
And according to trusty wikipedia Lambert is on 28%, which is the real issue I assume? |
Ok 28. Cheers.
I don't believe a word he says, the rotation was arrogant and confusing for all and bringing on Sears in the 90th minute v Oxford summed him up.
Anyway he won't be here too much longer. The fans rule and have found him out. | | | |
| Why FIVE years? on 14:40 - Feb 27 with 2297 views | SamWhiteUK |
| Why FIVE years? on 13:37 - Feb 27 by Herbivore |
We don't have a 5 year plan do we? I think we did under Roy or Jewell or maybe Mick, but pretty sure it's now just a 5 point plan. |
Whoops, yeah, you're right. What point are we on now? | | | |
| Why FIVE years? on 14:41 - Feb 27 with 2294 views | footers |
| Why FIVE years? on 14:40 - Feb 27 by SamWhiteUK |
Whoops, yeah, you're right. What point are we on now? |
We're on 'What's the point?' | |
| |
| Why FIVE years? on 14:51 - Feb 27 with 2275 views | Doctor_Earman |
There's pretty much zero chance that Lambert will see out that contract. Evans will have to act in order to stop ticket sales from plummeting. It will be a massive U-turn and about face from Evans and will be yet another example of his utter incompetence. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
