| Robert Jenrick then 10:49 - Jun 11 with 1816 views | Steve_M |
Too scared to answer an Urgent Parliamentary question today on accusations that he approved a property development in return for a donation to Tory party funds.
I mean he should have resigned for breaching lockdown regulations in March but quite hard to see how he would survive now in a normal government. Unfortunately in this one he'll be fine. |  |
| |  |
| Robert Jenrick then on 10:52 - Jun 11 with 1787 views | factual_blue |
Is 'playing tennis' with boris code for sexual shenanigans? |  |
| |
| Robert Jenrick then on 10:59 - Jun 11 with 1739 views | Swansea_Blue |
He needed to look at some notes urgently to check his eyesight, that's all. |  |
| |
| Robert Jenrick then on 11:04 - Jun 11 with 1719 views | BrianTablet |
Fayk Nooz
"Wibble, piffle, jubble, flub, The errr Lubov Chernukhin money isn't errr a donation, it's actually errr an investment in the errr future of the Russian State.
"Jenners was errr simply .... errr piffling wooty nubbins.... upgrading the inside of his pantaloons."
Tories, pah. |  |
| |
| Robert Jenrick then on 11:05 - Jun 11 with 1718 views | giant_stow |
12 grand sounds cheap. cheap and nasty. |  |
| |
| Robert Jenrick then on 11:22 - Jun 11 with 1656 views | WeWereZombies |
| Robert Jenrick then on 11:05 - Jun 11 by giant_stow |
12 grand sounds cheap. cheap and nasty. |
Actually, that a former publisher of The Daily Express, The Sunday Express and The Daily Star made a donation to the Conservative Party is not that surprising. The amount is relatively small; so I think we have to ask two questions:
1) Is this being pursued because of the timing?
2) As Sky appear to be leading the reporting of this, is it motivated by a concern for the public interest or is it an indication of a press war over who gets to influence the party in power and how they can go about it? |  |
| |
| Robert Jenrick then on 11:29 - Jun 11 with 1629 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Robert Jenrick then on 11:05 - Jun 11 by giant_stow |
12 grand sounds cheap. cheap and nasty. |
I'd be amazed if anyone took a £12k bung to put a £1bn development through.
Market value for that bung must be at least £1m!! |  |
| |
| Robert Jenrick then on 11:34 - Jun 11 with 1615 views | Steve_M |
| Robert Jenrick then on 11:29 - Jun 11 by Marshalls_Mullet |
I'd be amazed if anyone took a £12k bung to put a £1bn development through.
Market value for that bung must be at least £1m!! |
it does seem remarkably cheap. If it were the case that the two events were unconnected then it should have been an easy ministerial statement for him to deny on the Commons today then. | |
| |
| Robert Jenrick then on 11:52 - Jun 11 with 1549 views | WeWereZombies |
| Robert Jenrick then on 11:34 - Jun 11 by Steve_M |
it does seem remarkably cheap. If it were the case that the two events were unconnected then it should have been an easy ministerial statement for him to deny on the Commons today then. |
So Sky are trying to engineer a changing of the guard? | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Robert Jenrick then on 12:47 - Jun 11 with 1426 views | Illinoisblue |
Remember when corrupt politicians used to resign when caught with their hands in the till. |  |
| |
| Robert Jenrick then on 13:53 - Jun 11 with 1329 views | Plums |
| Robert Jenrick then on 12:47 - Jun 11 by Illinoisblue |
Remember when corrupt politicians used to resign when caught with their hands in the till. |
Cash for condominiums? |  |
| |
| Robert Jenrick then on 14:10 - Jun 11 with 1297 views | BloomBlue |
| Robert Jenrick then on 11:29 - Jun 11 by Marshalls_Mullet |
I'd be amazed if anyone took a £12k bung to put a £1bn development through.
Market value for that bung must be at least £1m!! |
When I worked at the Council I would never accept such a low bung, I would see that as insulting |  | | |
| Robert Jenrick then on 14:51 - Jun 11 with 1242 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Robert Jenrick then on 14:10 - Jun 11 by BloomBlue |
When I worked at the Council I would never accept such a low bung, I would see that as insulting |
It would hardly cover a good lunch in the City!! | |
| |
| Robert Jenrick then on 15:37 - Jun 11 with 1192 views | BloomBlue |
| Robert Jenrick then on 14:51 - Jun 11 by Marshalls_Mullet |
It would hardly cover a good lunch in the City!! |
Precisely. At the Borough Council they would never be allowed to build anything ever again unless the bung was a minimum 5% of future value | | | |
| Robert Jenrick then on 16:09 - Jun 11 with 1148 views | factual_blue |
| Robert Jenrick then on 11:05 - Jun 11 by giant_stow |
12 grand sounds cheap. cheap and nasty. |
Which, let's be honest, is a description that fits richard desmond to a tee.
Has he not realised that he's too sordid for even the tories to give him a knighthood? | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
