| Gibson deal no longer needed? 22:18 - Jul 25 with 1937 views | ElderGrizzly |
He’s in USA with Everton for a couple of weeks, but if we are getting Edmundson and an experienced CB in, do we need him?
|  | | |  |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:19 - Jul 25 with 1908 views | Kieran_Knows |
More importantly, number 15 for a keeper? That is absolutely criminal. |  |
| |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:20 - Jul 25 with 1876 views | TIB |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:19 - Jul 25 by Kieran_Knows |
More importantly, number 15 for a keeper? That is absolutely criminal. |
15 for a keeper is all sorts of f**ked |  |
| |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:23 - Jul 25 with 1840 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:19 - Jul 25 by Kieran_Knows |
More importantly, number 15 for a keeper? That is absolutely criminal. |
Patricio’s 99 was bad enough.
Assume 15 has some kind of personal meaning | | | |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:24 - Jul 25 with 1817 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:23 - Jul 25 by ElderGrizzly |
Patricio’s 99 was bad enough.
Assume 15 has some kind of personal meaning |
Presume you mean 11 whilst at Wolves? Genuinely kept my up at night.
Like other leagues, we should have set numbers for keepers - 1, 13 & 24 (Spain is similar but it’s 25). | |
| |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:24 - Jul 25 with 1805 views | pointofblue |
I assume we might have decided we wanted a player in permanently rather than on loan, so pulled out of the deal? |  |
| |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:24 - Jul 25 with 1795 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:24 - Jul 25 by Kieran_Knows |
Presume you mean 11 whilst at Wolves? Genuinely kept my up at night.
Like other leagues, we should have set numbers for keepers - 1, 13 & 24 (Spain is similar but it’s 25). |
Ha. Yes. No idea where I dredged 99 up from | | | |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:25 - Jul 25 with 1774 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:24 - Jul 25 by pointofblue |
I assume we might have decided we wanted a player in permanently rather than on loan, so pulled out of the deal? |
Didn’t we want Gibson on a permanent deal?
If so, assume Edmundson replaces that. | | | |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:27 - Jul 25 with 1722 views | SitfcB |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:25 - Jul 25 by ElderGrizzly |
Didn’t we want Gibson on a permanent deal?
If so, assume Edmundson replaces that. |
Don’t think Everton wanted a permanent deal to be done. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:28 - Jul 25 with 1720 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:27 - Jul 25 by SitfcB |
Don’t think Everton wanted a permanent deal to be done. |
Which was my point. We did, they didn’t so we move on. | | | |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:33 - Jul 25 with 1664 views | pointofblue |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:25 - Jul 25 by ElderGrizzly |
Didn’t we want Gibson on a permanent deal?
If so, assume Edmundson replaces that. |
Yes, we supposedly wanted Gibson permanetly but Everton only wanted to send him out on loan. | |
| |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:52 - Jul 25 with 1509 views | greyhound |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:24 - Jul 25 by ElderGrizzly |
Ha. Yes. No idea where I dredged 99 up from |
That's what donnarumma played under in Italy I believe | | | |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 01:17 - Jul 26 with 1205 views | Illinoisblue |
Game is live on TV here - Gibson just scored in penalty shoot out |  |
| |
| [Redacted] on 05:41 - Jul 26 with 1053 views | victorywilhappen |
| Gibson deal no longer needed? on 22:23 - Jul 25 by ElderGrizzly |
Patricio’s 99 was bad enough.
Assume 15 has some kind of personal meaning |
[Redacted] |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
