| "fraser sold for a profit" 17:21 - Feb 1 with 1092 views | positivity |
got me thinking, who's the last player we sold for more than we spent (not including freebies or youths)?
do we have to go back to garner/waghorn? |  |
| |  |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:33 - Feb 1 with 1029 views | homer_123 |
Dozzell? |  |
| |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:39 - Feb 1 with 1004 views | FrimleyBlue |
I highly doubt he's been sold for a profit. Transfer fee may be higher itself. But we'd have paid out in settling frasers contract anyway.
Imo. |  |
| |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:40 - Feb 1 with 995 views | ArnieM |
I thought we paid £750k for Fraser? So not sure how £500k is deemed a profit. |  |
| |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:42 - Feb 1 with 986 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:39 - Feb 1 by FrimleyBlue |
I highly doubt he's been sold for a profit. Transfer fee may be higher itself. But we'd have paid out in settling frasers contract anyway.
Imo. |
Settling Frasers contract?
Unless its been stated, I don't see any reason to suspect that.
He would be a high earner, but I doubt out of reach for Charlton. |  |
| |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:42 - Feb 1 with 980 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:40 - Feb 1 by ArnieM |
I thought we paid £750k for Fraser? So not sure how £500k is deemed a profit. |
No one knows what we paid, but most reports in EADT suggest a profit.
£750k could have been the max value after future add ons. | |
| |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:47 - Feb 1 with 956 views | xrayspecs |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:40 - Feb 1 by ArnieM |
I thought we paid £750k for Fraser? So not sure how £500k is deemed a profit. |
The total value could have been 750k, but only if all the add-ons were triggered. Given he was only here six months, I suspect that only the initial payment has been made. So, something like, paid £450k, £300k add-ons now lapsed, so £500k fee received gives a small profit.
It does assume that we get the full £500k fee from Charlton. | | | |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:49 - Feb 1 with 947 views | xrayspecs |
Possibly Waghorn?
We did well on Webster, Mings and going back a bit Creswell | | | |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:52 - Feb 1 with 931 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:49 - Feb 1 by xrayspecs |
Possibly Waghorn?
We did well on Webster, Mings and going back a bit Creswell |
To be fair to Evans, he did resist a £7m bid for McGoldrick who then left on a free.
Also rejected a decent bid for Jackson, although I'm not sure that would have been profit territory. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:56 - Feb 1 with 906 views | clive_baker |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:40 - Feb 1 by ArnieM |
I thought we paid £750k for Fraser? So not sure how £500k is deemed a profit. |
I would think there would be add ons in our fee, which would be largely unmet. If I had to guess I think we probably paid c. £500k and got broadly that back. Not sure why we would need to settle his contract, I'm sure Charlton are capable of matching the wages he was on here. I expect we broadly broke even on him (excluding the wages he earned whilst here) if I were a betting man. |  |
| |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 18:00 - Feb 1 with 891 views | Wickets |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:52 - Feb 1 by Marshalls_Mullet |
To be fair to Evans, he did resist a £7m bid for McGoldrick who then left on a free.
Also rejected a decent bid for Jackson, although I'm not sure that would have been profit territory. |
My recollection was that ME thought he could get more than the £7m messed about so got told to do one ? but who knows . |  | | |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 18:14 - Feb 1 with 829 views | Radlett_blue |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:52 - Feb 1 by Marshalls_Mullet |
To be fair to Evans, he did resist a £7m bid for McGoldrick who then left on a free.
Also rejected a decent bid for Jackson, although I'm not sure that would have been profit territory. |
Leicester offered £5m for McGoldrick & apparently Evans asked for £8m, presumably because Mick didn't want to sell him. While we cheered at the time, £5m would have been good business as he only played about half the games in each of the next 4 seasons. |  |
| |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 18:21 - Feb 1 with 787 views | BiGDonnie |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:39 - Feb 1 by FrimleyBlue |
I highly doubt he's been sold for a profit. Transfer fee may be higher itself. But we'd have paid out in settling frasers contract anyway.
Imo. |
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz |  |
| |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 18:40 - Feb 1 with 712 views | ArnieM |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:47 - Feb 1 by xrayspecs |
The total value could have been 750k, but only if all the add-ons were triggered. Given he was only here six months, I suspect that only the initial payment has been made. So, something like, paid £450k, £300k add-ons now lapsed, so £500k fee received gives a small profit.
It does assume that we get the full £500k fee from Charlton. |
Ah, I see . Thank you for that , much appreciated 👠| |
| |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 19:02 - Feb 1 with 653 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| "fraser sold for a profit" on 17:40 - Feb 1 by ArnieM |
I thought we paid £750k for Fraser? So not sure how £500k is deemed a profit. |
Deflated market. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
