| Keogh why? 18:27 - Feb 4 with 2573 views | Bobsthename |
is he in this team no pace slow thinker wolfie unfit just solidified my suggestion we needed. decent centre half loan or perm was a must we keep conceding and while that happens we won’t succeed never realised till today we haven’t won back to back since mid October which is all most 4 months that won’t get us up.
And today is another reason why i don’t think we would win the play offs. |  | | |  |
| Keogh why? on 18:29 - Feb 4 with 2546 views | ITFC_Forever |
So slow. |  |
| |
| Keogh why? on 18:35 - Feb 4 with 2492 views | backwaywhen |
Any team that plays a 37 year old centre half will not win promotion , he mobility becomes a key target for the opposition , great when younger but now past his sell by date I’m afraid . | | | |
| Keogh why? on 18:46 - Feb 4 with 2414 views | ITFC_Forever |
| Keogh why? on 18:35 - Feb 4 by backwaywhen |
Any team that plays a 37 year old centre half will not win promotion , he mobility becomes a key target for the opposition , great when younger but now past his sell by date I’m afraid . |
He wasn’t even that good then. Always had a rick in him, and is now slower than ever. | |
| |
| Keogh why? on 18:46 - Feb 4 with 2410 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Keogh why? on 18:35 - Feb 4 by backwaywhen |
Any team that plays a 37 year old centre half will not win promotion , he mobility becomes a key target for the opposition , great when younger but now past his sell by date I’m afraid . |
And yet both the goal and the penalty were the fault of his 25 year old defensive partner. |  |
| |
| Keogh why? on 18:52 - Feb 4 with 2354 views | Bobsthename |
| Keogh why? on 18:46 - Feb 4 by GlasgowBlue |
And yet both the goal and the penalty were the fault of his 25 year old defensive partner. |
Well driving back from Norfolk on suffolk radio Mills said he was being beaten on pace every time not a good thing if you want to minimise a goal threat in general.
Mckenna is at fault he just admitted all centre halves are fit he though Keogh and Edmundson deserved their places he fooked up there. | | | |
| Keogh why? on 18:55 - Feb 4 with 2336 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Keogh why? on 18:52 - Feb 4 by Bobsthename |
Well driving back from Norfolk on suffolk radio Mills said he was being beaten on pace every time not a good thing if you want to minimise a goal threat in general.
Mckenna is at fault he just admitted all centre halves are fit he though Keogh and Edmundson deserved their places he fooked up there. |
That doesn't change the fact that it was Edmundson who was at fault for both their goal and their penalty. | |
| |
| Keogh why? on 18:56 - Feb 4 with 2321 views | Bobsthename |
| Keogh why? on 18:55 - Feb 4 by GlasgowBlue |
That doesn't change the fact that it was Edmundson who was at fault for both their goal and their penalty. |
Didn’t see it and haven’t yet,But Keogh in all honestly shouldn’t be anywhere near our first team fact. | | | |
| Keogh why? on 18:58 - Feb 4 with 2302 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Keogh why? on 18:56 - Feb 4 by Bobsthename |
Didn’t see it and haven’t yet,But Keogh in all honestly shouldn’t be anywhere near our first team fact. |
You didn't see it and yet your op seemed to put the blame for today's result on Keogh. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Keogh why? on 19:01 - Feb 4 with 2290 views | bournemouthblue |
I get the impression McKenna feels Keogh deals with the aerial threat better, however teams who play that often have someone pacey playing off them which Keogh definitely isn't very good at dealing with at all
I get the need for an experienced head amongst the ranks and behind the scenes, however you'd rather it was someone like Ryan Bennett who Cambridge have picked up on a free recently, rather than Keogh who for me is past it at this level
He's fine for the Pizza Cup but that's where I would be leaving him |  |
| |
| Keogh why? on 19:01 - Feb 4 with 2289 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
The Cambridge commentators made him our best player...nuff said!! |  |
| |
| Keogh why? on 19:03 - Feb 4 with 2279 views | witchdoctor |
Funnily enough the commentators on the Cambridge IFollow had Keogh as our MOM… |  | | |
| Keogh why? on 19:06 - Feb 4 with 2266 views | Bobsthename |
| Keogh why? on 19:01 - Feb 4 by BanksterDebtSlave |
The Cambridge commentators made him our best player...nuff said!! |
Hahahaha bloody hahaha your funny you must be lost in this football thread. | | | |
| Keogh why? on 19:06 - Feb 4 with 2259 views | Bobsthename |
| Keogh why? on 19:03 - Feb 4 by witchdoctor |
Funnily enough the commentators on the Cambridge IFollow had Keogh as our MOM… |
Think they must of been taking the urine out of him. | | | |
| Keogh why? on 19:08 - Feb 4 with 2242 views | pointofblue |
| Keogh why? on 19:03 - Feb 4 by witchdoctor |
Funnily enough the commentators on the Cambridge IFollow had Keogh as our MOM… |
Sure they weren't saying he was their Man of the Match? | |
| |
| Keogh why? on 19:12 - Feb 4 with 2209 views | Sharkey |
| Keogh why? on 19:03 - Feb 4 by witchdoctor |
Funnily enough the commentators on the Cambridge IFollow had Keogh as our MOM… |
Were they the BBC Cambridgeshire commentators? In the past I've been very impressed by just how East Anglian their accents are. |  | | |
| Keogh why? on 19:13 - Feb 4 with 2207 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
| Keogh why? on 19:06 - Feb 4 by Bobsthename |
Hahahaha bloody hahaha your funny you must be lost in this football thread. |
You're.....you might have a point! | |
| |
| Keogh why? on 19:38 - Feb 4 with 2092 views | witchdoctor |
| Keogh why? on 19:12 - Feb 4 by Sharkey |
Were they the BBC Cambridgeshire commentators? In the past I've been very impressed by just how East Anglian their accents are. |
I thought the same..😂😂 | | | |
| Keogh why? on 23:24 - Feb 4 with 1842 views | BLUEGOLD |
| Keogh why? on 18:55 - Feb 4 by GlasgowBlue |
That doesn't change the fact that it was Edmundson who was at fault for both their goal and their penalty. |
Morsy & Evans were weak & lost out to Digby. Knibbs picked up the ball & Keogh backed off him instead of closing him down. Edmondson was not involved at all for that first goal.
The second goal involved 3 players Clarke, Keogh & Evans allowing the forward to run into the box before Edmondson mistimes his tackle to concede the penalty.
Just blaming the tackler at the end is unfair imo | | | |
| Keogh why? on 23:33 - Feb 4 with 1806 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Keogh why? on 23:24 - Feb 4 by BLUEGOLD |
Morsy & Evans were weak & lost out to Digby. Knibbs picked up the ball & Keogh backed off him instead of closing him down. Edmondson was not involved at all for that first goal.
The second goal involved 3 players Clarke, Keogh & Evans allowing the forward to run into the box before Edmondson mistimes his tackle to concede the penalty.
Just blaming the tackler at the end is unfair imo |
Second goal! Did we lose? |  | | |
| Keogh why? on 23:48 - Feb 4 with 1774 views | nshearman1 |
| Keogh why? on 18:58 - Feb 4 by GlasgowBlue |
You didn't see it and yet your op seemed to put the blame for today's result on Keogh. |
Clearly Mc thought putting out that defensive line-up would work because it did at home to Morecambe. But that was at home to surely one of the worst teams in the League. Cambridge have more about them - particularly against us. He needs to re-think our back line. There are serious questions against both Keogh and Fridge. | | | |
| Keogh why? on 00:31 - Feb 5 with 1718 views | Bobsthename |
| Keogh why? on 18:58 - Feb 4 by GlasgowBlue |
You didn't see it and yet your op seemed to put the blame for today's result on Keogh. |
Listen you i am commenting on what i heard MickMills said and i believe him over your jibes,
But i also saw Keogh get out sprinted on the highlights and he had a head start. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
