| So in a protest for peace 10:20 - Nov 12 with 18190 views | GlasgowBlue |
Peter Tatchell was stopped from marching for holding sings saying
“Free Palestine”.
“Armistice Now”.
“End Israel’s Occupation”. (Twice)
“End Hamas’s Sexist, Homophobic, AntiHuman Rights Dictatorship”
What part did the organisers disagree with?
|  |
| |  |
| So in a protest for peace on 14:02 - Nov 14 with 377 views | leitrimblue |
| So in a protest for peace on 13:22 - Nov 14 by lowhouseblue |
you have no evidence to support any of these allegations. proportionate also involves assessing alternatives - no one has offered any alternatives. i agree that israel must do more to protect the civilian population - and they need achievable aims which can be achieved quickly and with an exit strategy - all of those are legitimate criticisms of israel. but i wouldn't challenge their legal or moral right to attack hamas in the slightest. |
So it all comes back to Noggins question the other day. How many Palestinian Children are you willing to see killed in order for Isreal to achieve its aims of the theoretical destruction of Hamas?
Obviously 5000 doesn't do it, what about 10000? 50000?
How many innocent children have to be killed before you think enough is enough? |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
