Forum | Is it possible that this little run of sub par results by Vic

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Is it possible that this little run of sub par results 17:08 - Jan 1 with 766 views

and the subsequent bunching up of 2nd - 4th might encourage Gamechanger to loosen the purse strings a little more than planned?

And this isnt a criticism but if there was any doubt before there can be none now that outside of our first 11 we have a big drop off in quality - especially in midfield and up front.

[Post edited 1 Jan 2024 17:09]

Poll:

Right now, who would you rather have as Prime Minister?

Is it possible that this little run of sub par results on 17:09 - Jan 1 with 734 views

FrimleyBlue

They'd give us the maximum we can spend. Don't think it would have mattered if we were 2nd or 15th.

	a niche perspective
Poll:	We've had Kuqi v Pablo.. so Broadhead or Celina?
Blog:	Marcus Evans Needs Our Support Not to Be Hounded Out

Is it possible that this little run of sub par results on 17:11 - Jan 1 with 699 views

RegencyBlue

I think Gamechanger will back us as much as they can within FFP restrictions.

Whether that’s enough time will tell!

Is it possible that this little run of sub par results on 17:13 - Jan 1 with 634 views

WestSussexBlue

Is it possible that this little run of sub par results on 17:09 - Jan 1 by FrimleyBlue
They'd give us the maximum we can spend. Don't think it would have mattered if we were 2nd or 15th.

Disagree with your final point. We are Second with a good chance of promotion, our goals are very different than if we were 15th I would say.

Is it possible that this little run of sub par results on 17:13 - Jan 1 with 631 views

DarkBrandon

Is it possible that this little run of sub par results on 17:09 - Jan 1 by FrimleyBlue
They'd give us the maximum we can spend. Don't think it would have mattered if we were 2nd or 15th.

Exactly this. The Fpp limit is there, and we will be right up to it.

Is it possible that this little run of sub par results on 17:15 - Jan 1 with 589 views

Nutkins_Return

Is it possible that this little run of sub par results on 17:11 - Jan 1 by RegencyBlue
I think Gamechanger will back us as much as they can within FFP restrictions. Whether that’s enough time will tell!

Exactly. Gamechanger won't be the limiter. FFP is the ball ache.

I imagine we can spend 5-7 million in fees and for top quality it won't go that far.

Poll:

Who do we think McKenna (not you) will partner Greaves with ?

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread