Why can’t we hold a defensive shape like WBA? 13:07 - Feb 10 with 751 views | GlasgowBlue | 2 banks of four every time we attack. |  |
| |  |
Why can’t we hold a defensive shape like WBA? on 13:09 - Feb 10 with 717 views | FrimleyBlue | Because either clarke is ignoring KM and going everywhere Or KM Is telling him to be everywhere. Plus we have 2 cms who can't get up and back quick enough. |  |
|  |
Why can’t we hold a defensive shape like WBA? on 13:13 - Feb 10 with 663 views | strikalite | Hence they don't score as many goals as us ... Can't have it both ways really.. |  | |  |
Why can’t we hold a defensive shape like WBA? on 13:15 - Feb 10 with 653 views | Illinoisblue | They are incredibly well organized and disciplined. |  |
|  |
Why can’t we hold a defensive shape like WBA? on 13:22 - Feb 10 with 607 views | pointofblue |
Why can’t we hold a defensive shape like WBA? on 13:15 - Feb 10 by Illinoisblue | They are incredibly well organized and disciplined. |
Two things we're not, defensively. [Post edited 10 Feb 2024 13:23]
|  |
|  |
Why can’t we hold a defensive shape like WBA? on 13:29 - Feb 10 with 539 views | NthQldITFC | Because they're 1-0 up and we're 0-1 down. |  |
|  |
Why can’t we hold a defensive shape like WBA? on 13:30 - Feb 10 with 526 views | BondiBlue |
Why can’t we hold a defensive shape like WBA? on 13:15 - Feb 10 by Illinoisblue | They are incredibly well organized and disciplined. |
And incredibly dull to watch. Defend defend defend hoof, and repeat. Careful what you wish for. |  |
|  |
Why can’t we hold a defensive shape like WBA? on 13:34 - Feb 10 with 508 views | BlueBadger | Somewhere in an alterative universe, their Glassers is posting 'sure, we're 1-0 up but goals aside we're so boring to watch'. |  |
|  |
| |