| What are they watching? 14:17 - Mar 17 with 823 views | Dyland |
Commentators saying definite contact.
I don't see contact at all. He's taken a fackin dive innit? |  |
| |  |
| Just as well I aint a ref, arf (n/t) on 14:18 - Mar 17 with 804 views | Dyland |
| |
| |
| What are they watching? on 14:18 - Mar 17 with 802 views | Bent_double |
Yeah, Jackson was looking for that.
VAR gets it right, red card and no penalty. Wow! |  |
| |
| It's a foul Mr Magoo, and a red card cos it was outside. Lovely stuff. (n/t) on 14:19 - Mar 17 with 790 views | Bloots |
|  |
| Elite Level Poster: Elite Level Supporter: Elite Level Human |
| |
| What are they watching? on 14:20 - Mar 17 with 768 views | Dubtractor |
nah, he caught his trailing leg. No malice, but its a foul and a red. |  |
| |
| What are they watching? on 14:20 - Mar 17 with 766 views | bazza |
WTF 😂😂😂 |  | | |
| What are they watching? on 14:22 - Mar 17 with 734 views | Bent_double |
It's 10 v 10 now anyway, with Sterling on the pitch  | |
| |
| What are they watching? on 14:22 - Mar 17 with 731 views | Churchman |
Sent him off now! No contact. Chelsea cheat kicks his own leg and dived. It should have been a free kick for Leicester and a booking for the forward.
VAR? You’re having a laugh.
This ‘contact’ rubbish. The best bet is to say you are not allowed within 6 feet of an opponent. No more disputes or ‘contact’. And no game. [Post edited 17 Mar 14:23]
|  | | |
| What are they watching? on 14:24 - Mar 17 with 692 views | NthQldITFC |
I think Doyle deliberately ran across his heels (very minor contact, but enough to trip the striker - a bit like a rugby ankle tap) because he knew he couldn't get in front of him. Clever foul but correct decision for me. |  |
| # WE ARE STEALING THE FUTURE FROM OUR CHILDREN --- WE MUST CHANGE COURSE # | | Poll: | It's driving me nuts |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| It was a fairly obvious foul. (n/t) on 14:26 - Mar 17 with 670 views | Bloots |
| What are they watching? on 14:22 - Mar 17 by Churchman |
Sent him off now! No contact. Chelsea cheat kicks his own leg and dived. It should have been a free kick for Leicester and a booking for the forward.
VAR? You’re having a laugh.
This ‘contact’ rubbish. The best bet is to say you are not allowed within 6 feet of an opponent. No more disputes or ‘contact’. And no game. [Post edited 17 Mar 14:23]
|
| |
| Elite Level Poster: Elite Level Supporter: Elite Level Human |
| |
| What are they watching? on 14:27 - Mar 17 with 659 views | redrickstuhaart |
| What are they watching? on 14:22 - Mar 17 by Churchman |
Sent him off now! No contact. Chelsea cheat kicks his own leg and dived. It should have been a free kick for Leicester and a booking for the forward.
VAR? You’re having a laugh.
This ‘contact’ rubbish. The best bet is to say you are not allowed within 6 feet of an opponent. No more disputes or ‘contact’. And no game. [Post edited 17 Mar 14:23]
|
No- he caught the leg. The red is because it was a clear opportunity. Had it been a pen, you dont give the red, because they introduced the concept that a pen is enough in that situation. |  | | |
| What are they watching? on 14:35 - Mar 17 with 607 views | bazza |
There must be a net on top of the stand 😂 | | | |
| What are they watching? on 14:42 - Mar 17 with 574 views | backwaywhen |
| What are they watching? on 14:20 - Mar 17 by Dubtractor |
nah, he caught his trailing leg. No malice, but its a foul and a red. |
Jackson dragged his left foot against his right calf to make it look like a trip ……blatant cheating that they obviously practice and perfect …….sad really. | | | |
| What are they watching? on 14:44 - Mar 17 with 556 views | redrickstuhaart |
| What are they watching? on 14:42 - Mar 17 by backwaywhen |
Jackson dragged his left foot against his right calf to make it look like a trip ……blatant cheating that they obviously practice and perfect …….sad really. |
I disagree. There was contact before that which caused it. | | | |
| What are they watching? on 14:44 - Mar 17 with 556 views | Churchman |
| What are they watching? on 14:27 - Mar 17 by redrickstuhaart |
No- he caught the leg. The red is because it was a clear opportunity. Had it been a pen, you dont give the red, because they introduced the concept that a pen is enough in that situation. |
Not for me. If that’s a foul/red card then every contact anywhere on the pitch, even if it’s a finger brushing an expensive hairdo should be a foul and a yellow. In other words, you have no game.
You can tell he was barely touched outside the area, if at all, by the way he kicked the back of his leg inside the area to try and con the ref into a penalty. | | | |
| Incorrect on every point ba on 14:48 - Mar 17 with 512 views | Dyland |
| What are they watching? on 14:27 - Mar 17 by redrickstuhaart |
No- he caught the leg. The red is because it was a clear opportunity. Had it been a pen, you dont give the red, because they introduced the concept that a pen is enough in that situation. |
No contact (or not enough for a foul).
It's a red because there was no attempt to get the ball (in view of the officials which imo is bollix).
They gave a red for that reason, as well as a pen, in a game yesterday. | |
| |
| Incorrect on every point ba on 14:53 - Mar 17 with 474 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Incorrect on every point ba on 14:48 - Mar 17 by Dyland |
No contact (or not enough for a foul).
It's a red because there was no attempt to get the ball (in view of the officials which imo is bollix).
They gave a red for that reason, as well as a pen, in a game yesterday. |
Clear goalscoring opportunity- was last man.
I think there was contact. Heels clipped. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
