Williams thread 10:07 - Mar 23 with 1619 views | PhilTWTD | Removed it given some of the comments speculating on the ongoing case and one or two other aspects of recent stories and rumours. Think it is best avoided, despite the court appearance. | | | | |
Williams thread on 10:22 - Mar 23 with 1558 views | SitfcB | | |
| |
Williams thread on 10:25 - Mar 23 with 1527 views | Keno |
Williams thread on 10:22 - Mar 23 by SitfcB | |
should that be "why always someone next to me"? | |
| |
Williams thread on 10:27 - Mar 23 with 1517 views | Ryorry | Shame it couldn’t be discussed without some people over-stepping. I’d just read page 1, then it disappeared before I could proceed. As I don’t read the Mirror or Shun, I wouldn’t have known what the issue actually is with Williams if it hadn’t been posted on here. | |
| |
Williams thread on 10:55 - Mar 23 with 1379 views | DJR | I was surprised such a thread was allowed to get off the ground, as the matter is sub judice. | | | |
Williams thread on 10:57 - Mar 23 with 1361 views | BlueBadger | I was just shocked that it wasn't the case that he'd [redacted] a [redacted] with [redacted] and a [redacted] whilst he was visiting [redacted]. | |
| |
Williams thread on 11:53 - Mar 23 with 1174 views | WeWereZombies | So can I post 'Were Town courting Williams before he was caught and ended up in court' ? Obviously I can't, because if he was caught then he would have had to have been doing something to have warranted being caught, allegedlly.. So I will just suggest that he is played by Bud Cort when they make the film of it all. | |
| |
Williams thread on 12:05 - Mar 23 with 1120 views | Swansea_Blue |
Williams thread on 10:25 - Mar 23 by Keno | should that be "why always someone next to me"? |
trust you to shoe in that that joke! | |
| |
| |