Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Have we actually been linked with Jack Clarke? 09:36 - Aug 21 with 1309 viewsEssexBloo

I’ve seen 100s of posts that we should try and get him but can’t recall any official links.

Leeds have been quoted £25m for him so it would seem he would be out of our price range in any event.
0
Have we actually been linked with Jack Clarke? on 09:40 - Aug 21 with 1239 viewsITFC_Forever

Yes, a month or so ago I think.

P 1162, W 506, D 298, L 358, F 1749, A 1435 92/92
Blog: Confessions of a Statto - Why We Bother

0
Have we actually been linked with Jack Clarke? on 09:42 - Aug 21 with 1223 viewsNutkins_Return

Yes there were some media links few weeks back and probably agents kick this off. I think Phil said there was some interest but played down as being just one on a long list and that wasn't so high up on the list (I'm sure that interest on the list is weighing up the cost as well not just ability). He's a good player (I have a question mark whether he quite has the killer pace for the prem but would be happy to sign him. I think the issue is Sunderland don't need to sell and they have more a very high premium on his head £25-30 million.

Poll: Who do we think McKenna (not you) will partner Greaves with ?

0
Have we actually been linked with Jack Clarke? on 09:44 - Aug 21 with 1208 viewsPhilTWTD

Have we actually been linked with Jack Clarke? on 09:42 - Aug 21 by Nutkins_Return

Yes there were some media links few weeks back and probably agents kick this off. I think Phil said there was some interest but played down as being just one on a long list and that wasn't so high up on the list (I'm sure that interest on the list is weighing up the cost as well not just ability). He's a good player (I have a question mark whether he quite has the killer pace for the prem but would be happy to sign him. I think the issue is Sunderland don't need to sell and they have more a very high premium on his head £25-30 million.


Yes, got confirmed he was on the list but a move wasn't as imminent as some reports claimed, as time has shown to be the case. Still on the radar as far as I'm aware and think we're stil looking at that area.
3
Have we actually been linked with Jack Clarke? on 09:47 - Aug 21 with 1160 viewsEssexBloo

Have we actually been linked with Jack Clarke? on 09:44 - Aug 21 by PhilTWTD

Yes, got confirmed he was on the list but a move wasn't as imminent as some reports claimed, as time has shown to be the case. Still on the radar as far as I'm aware and think we're stil looking at that area.


Nice. Thanks Phil.
0
Have we actually been linked with Jack Clarke? on 09:50 - Aug 21 with 1114 viewsipswichtillidie

Have we actually been linked with Jack Clarke? on 09:44 - Aug 21 by PhilTWTD

Yes, got confirmed he was on the list but a move wasn't as imminent as some reports claimed, as time has shown to be the case. Still on the radar as far as I'm aware and think we're stil looking at that area.


Other than Clarke Phil, anyone else on the list in that LF position? Not been many names banded about. Obviously Philogene and that’s been it.

Gav

0
Have we actually been linked with Jack Clarke? on 09:58 - Aug 21 with 1038 viewsportmanking

Have we actually been linked with Jack Clarke? on 09:44 - Aug 21 by PhilTWTD

Yes, got confirmed he was on the list but a move wasn't as imminent as some reports claimed, as time has shown to be the case. Still on the radar as far as I'm aware and think we're stil looking at that area.


Unsurprising given Broadhead's injury/fitness record. As talented as Broady is, we can't hang our hat on him for a full season.
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025