Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Been hearing 433 mentioned a while now but would it make more sense? 13:34 - Dec 6 with 1120 viewsITFCMonk

Could go with


Muric

Johnson O’Shea Greaves Davis

Phillips Morsy Cajuste

Hutchinson Delap Szmodics


The only player that doesn’t really fit this system is Chaplin though. But then at least that gives us an option to change the dimension again if we bring him on and go back to playing the 10?

S A Monk

1
Been hearing 433 mentioned a while now but would it make more sense? on 13:37 - Dec 6 with 1085 viewsGuthrum

How would reducing the attacking element help us to score more goals? As that is what's needed, more than shoring up the defence.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Been hearing 433 mentioned a while now but would it make more sense? on 13:47 - Dec 6 with 1053 viewsSomethingBlue

Been hearing 433 mentioned a while now but would it make more sense? on 13:37 - Dec 6 by Guthrum

How would reducing the attacking element help us to score more goals? As that is what's needed, more than shoring up the defence.


If Cajuste was pushed forward to be an advanced 8/lower 10 then I see a fair argument for trying this. It's definitely a way of getting our best players out on the pitch at once.

Blog: The Way Back From Here Will Be Long, But There is a Way

0
Been hearing 433 mentioned a while now but would it make more sense? on 13:56 - Dec 6 with 1025 viewsGarv

Might be something we do sometimes but we're not going to change to this long term realistically, so Chaplin not suiting this isn't a problem for me.

I don't feel like we can play a three and still not find a spot for Taylor. I think Cajuste misses out in that scenario. I want Phillips to really get back in and cement his place, because he's been really good at times.

Poll: Pick a goal to win the derby in stoppage time...

0
Been hearing 433 mentioned a while now but would it make more sense? on 14:08 - Dec 6 with 982 viewsPinewoodblue

Been hearing 433 mentioned a while now but would it make more sense? on 13:37 - Dec 6 by Guthrum

How would reducing the attacking element help us to score more goals? As that is what's needed, more than shoring up the defence.


Converting chances into goals isn’t the problem, that is not creating enough chances.

Having an extra body in midfield, prepared to carry the ball forward, would make a difference. Preferable to a front player falling back to get it as it can be executed quicker.

Would also stop us being outnumbered in a critical area.

2023 year of destiny
Poll: Dickhead "Noun" a stupid, irritating, or ridiculous man.

0
Been hearing 433 mentioned a while now but would it make more sense? on 14:11 - Dec 6 with 974 viewsSwansea_Blue

Been hearing 433 mentioned a while now but would it make more sense? on 13:37 - Dec 6 by Guthrum

How would reducing the attacking element help us to score more goals? As that is what's needed, more than shoring up the defence.


Quite. I’d go all Kevin Keegan with a 2-0-8.

I do find fans’ fascination in general with nominal starting formations quite odd. Most teams play relatively fluid games now, working various overloads on different parts of the pitch at different times. And that’s just in possession. There are then different defensive blocks employed depending on the score line/stage of the game.

(Reading that back seems like I’m being harsh on the OP - I don’t mean to be. Chewing the fat about the team is all part of being a fan of course).
[Post edited 6 Dec 2024 14:24]

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0
Been hearing 433 mentioned a while now but would it make more sense? on 16:26 - Dec 6 with 789 viewsStewart27

Been hearing 433 mentioned a while now but would it make more sense? on 13:56 - Dec 6 by Garv

Might be something we do sometimes but we're not going to change to this long term realistically, so Chaplin not suiting this isn't a problem for me.

I don't feel like we can play a three and still not find a spot for Taylor. I think Cajuste misses out in that scenario. I want Phillips to really get back in and cement his place, because he's been really good at times.


I want whoever is better to cement their place and on current form it’s Cajuste.
0
Been hearing 433 mentioned a while now but would it make more sense? on 19:26 - Dec 6 with 681 viewsGarv

Been hearing 433 mentioned a while now but would it make more sense? on 16:26 - Dec 6 by Stewart27

I want whoever is better to cement their place and on current form it’s Cajuste.


Arguably that's only because he's fit.

Get Phillips fit and he could prove to be the better option.

Poll: Pick a goal to win the derby in stoppage time...

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025