| Why no Smzodics yesterday 10:17 - Feb 23 with 876 views | Blue_Heath |
Surely alongside Delap he's our best chance at scoring a goal? |  | | |  |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 10:22 - Feb 23 with 831 views | homer_123 |
Not 100% fit. |  |
| |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 10:36 - Feb 23 with 773 views | SitfcB |
Use your brain. |  |
| |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 10:59 - Feb 23 with 700 views | pointofblue |
He may well have come on had Phillips had not gone off injured/Godfrey's issues in the first half resulted in an unusual defensive sub. | |
| |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 11:00 - Feb 23 with 693 views | Blue_Heath |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 10:22 - Feb 23 by homer_123 |
Not 100% fit. |
Fit enough for bench surely could have played last 30 mins? | | | |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 11:03 - Feb 23 with 673 views | Chocorange |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 11:00 - Feb 23 by Blue_Heath |
Fit enough for bench surely could have played last 30 mins? |
As there’s have said, not fully fit so why risk him.
If we he been 1 goal behind which 10 mins to go, We may have seen him, but with score as it was the game had gone, why on earth would you risk his fitness …let him recover for longer.
It’s simple and sensible given the situation of the match. |  | | |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 11:11 - Feb 23 with 647 views | Blue_Heath |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 11:03 - Feb 23 by Chocorange |
As there’s have said, not fully fit so why risk him.
If we he been 1 goal behind which 10 mins to go, We may have seen him, but with score as it was the game had gone, why on earth would you risk his fitness …let him recover for longer.
It’s simple and sensible given the situation of the match. |
If he wasn't fit why is he on the bench? | | | |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 11:25 - Feb 23 with 594 views | Chocorange |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 11:11 - Feb 23 by Blue_Heath |
If he wasn't fit why is he on the bench? |
Why do you think many players are eases back into action after injury , they often appear as subs fir 10 or 20 minutes to test out the injury ,SS has already made 1 try at restarting after injury and broke down at Coventry after 30 minutes.
Think we can probably trust our medical staff to know what is best for him. | | | |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 11:27 - Feb 23 with 582 views | stonojnr |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 11:11 - Feb 23 by Blue_Heath |
If he wasn't fit why is he on the bench? |
Which is a valid ask, the players on the bench should be fit enough to contribute some mins in a game if they're there.
But i guess our options are limited at the moment though, hence Godfrey for instance. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 11:29 - Feb 23 with 575 views | pointofblue |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 11:25 - Feb 23 by Chocorange |
Why do you think many players are eases back into action after injury , they often appear as subs fir 10 or 20 minutes to test out the injury ,SS has already made 1 try at restarting after injury and broke down at Coventry after 30 minutes.
Think we can probably trust our medical staff to know what is best for him. |
I think you're agreeing with the original question. If he's fit enough for the bench he should at least be available for 20-30 minutes. If he isn't, he shouldn't be on there. | |
| |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 11:44 - Feb 23 with 524 views | ArnieM |
If your going to play two strikers, it would be Hirst & Delap. But McKenna wont ever do that, no matter how things are going. |  |
| |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 11:47 - Feb 23 with 513 views | pointofblue |
| Why no Smzodics yesterday on 11:44 - Feb 23 by ArnieM |
If your going to play two strikers, it would be Hirst & Delap. But McKenna wont ever do that, no matter how things are going. |
He did against Southampton, albeit only for injury time.
The issue is we don't have a third striker to freshen things up. Ashton constantly asks for unity to try and stifle criticism but this one thing which should continually be asked about. The lack of action in that department has cost us dear. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
