Reform 06:58 - May 2 with 20730 views | Benters | Well done. They don’t like it up em 👍🇬🇧 |  |
| |  |
Reform on 14:29 - May 4 with 206 views | NedPlimpton |
Reform on 14:21 - May 4 by bluejacko | Demonising who? She has decided that the council does not require these positions and is acting accordingly. If she goes along and does this it’s hardly a sound bite but action described by her, Has it been said the council is firing black,brown or LGBT people? |
Clearly demonising DEI as a function This sort of stuff is honestly so childish. An adult would take a look at council spending, see where the priorities are, see where savings can be made etc. Not just go in and say "we're cutting all these jobs that don't actually exist" Is this really what we want from people in power? It's pathetic [Post edited 4 May 14:29]
|  | |  |
Reform on 14:34 - May 4 with 182 views | redrickstuhaart |
Reform on 14:21 - May 4 by bluejacko | Demonising who? She has decided that the council does not require these positions and is acting accordingly. If she goes along and does this it’s hardly a sound bite but action described by her, Has it been said the council is firing black,brown or LGBT people? |
What? The roles arent there. The only reasons for saying this are (1) ignorance, and not knowing (despite satnding for election and intending this as a policy) that they dont exist; and/or; (2) because its populist rhetoric which plays well with racists. |  | |  |
Reform on 15:08 - May 4 with 127 views | StokieBlue |
Reform on 14:21 - May 4 by bluejacko | Demonising who? She has decided that the council does not require these positions and is acting accordingly. If she goes along and does this it’s hardly a sound bite but action described by her, Has it been said the council is firing black,brown or LGBT people? |
Other have explained but if you can't see what they are doing then you're just confirming the points made by many, many posters in this thread. SB |  | |  |
| |