By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Do you believe KMc bought Liam Delap to lead the line on his own or did the injury to George Hirst, the failure to land the Greek guy or Broja ( lucky escape) force his hand? Was he bought to add more pace and power to the three behind a number 9 but because his early season form was outstanding, he fell into the defacto no 9 at the club. I genuinely feel we would have had more success as a team had Hirst been fit and Delap played as a 10. I guess though it worked better for Delap than the team.
bluescouser
0
When Town bought Delap on 19:35 - May 27 with 1491 views
We obviously wanted a different number 9 as that shirt was left and finally given to Enciso. Which means we never got a man we wanted for that position.
Then hirst was injured and with a lack of 9 Delap becomes that player by default.
2
When Town bought Delap on 21:06 - May 27 with 1271 views
Pretty sure we’d have seen him as a striker. It’s not unusual to start youngsters out wide (as we did with Hutch even though KM saw him more as an option for the central role.
When Town bought Delap on 21:06 - May 27 by WeirdFishes
Im sure at the time he was said to be competition for Burns / whoever the ‘main’ striker signing was, sadly the latter never materialised.
The stuff about him being signed to play on the right was always 2+2=5 but seemed to become received wisdom. Think it's fair to say he wasn't expected to start as many as he did so early in the season tho.