Brentford links 19:28 - Jul 17 with 1768 views | keanekipper | I see Brentford have been linked with Buchanan from inter and mbangula from juve, moving away from.hutch or calling our bluff on missing out on a big pay day? |  | | |  |
Brentford links on 19:31 - Jul 17 with 1720 views | berkstractorboy | Not sure they can call our bluff, we have already said we are keen to keep Omari so I don't think we need the money |  | |  |
Brentford links on 19:34 - Jul 17 with 1665 views | keanekipper |
Brentford links on 19:31 - Jul 17 by berkstractorboy | Not sure they can call our bluff, we have already said we are keen to keep Omari so I don't think we need the money |
We arent going to say anything different really though, don't want to lose him, but the figures being banded around is very hard to turn down, could fund a big rebuild of quality |  | |  |
Brentford links on 19:45 - Jul 17 with 1536 views | topguy |
Brentford links on 19:34 - Jul 17 by keanekipper | We arent going to say anything different really though, don't want to lose him, but the figures being banded around is very hard to turn down, could fund a big rebuild of quality |
thats if we need to sell, if we can afford the players we want without selling then best not doing |  | |  |
Brentford links on 19:54 - Jul 17 with 1405 views | Daninthecampo | Realistically teams like Brentford aren't going to win anything, so they rely on buying players ,developing ,then selling them on, At 35 or 40m there's not much room for profit especially as I'm sure we'll insert a sell on clause. Even in this ridiculous market there's not many players sold 50m+ Makes perfect sense to look abroad for cheaper options |  | |  |
Brentford links on 20:52 - Jul 17 with 1104 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
Brentford links on 19:34 - Jul 17 by keanekipper | We arent going to say anything different really though, don't want to lose him, but the figures being banded around is very hard to turn down, could fund a big rebuild of quality |
I’d say they are easy to turn down. The ‘profit’ would be useful, but not a game-changer. £100M would be a game-changer, and allow for the purchase of a reasonable Hutch replacement. At £35M, the profit isn’t massive, and it would be hard to find a suitable replacement that would come into the team and make the same contribution as Hutch. Keeping Hutch for next season is worth far more than the money being talked about. If we were to sell at that level, because Hutch wanted back in the EPL, I can accept that - but if he’ll stay, he’s worth far more to us than £35M imo. |  | |  |
Brentford links on 09:41 - Jul 18 with 548 views | hunty21 |
Brentford links on 19:34 - Jul 17 by keanekipper | We arent going to say anything different really though, don't want to lose him, but the figures being banded around is very hard to turn down, could fund a big rebuild of quality |
Rebuild ? Didn't we do that last summer? If we do that then this delays promotion by a year as the return of the word GEL will be banded around |  | |  |
Brentford links on 10:00 - Jul 18 with 447 views | football |
Brentford links on 19:34 - Jul 17 by keanekipper | We arent going to say anything different really though, don't want to lose him, but the figures being banded around is very hard to turn down, could fund a big rebuild of quality |
We don't need the money so think its easy to turn down. |  | |  |
Brentford links on 11:18 - Jul 18 with 313 views | vilanovablue |
Brentford links on 19:54 - Jul 17 by Daninthecampo | Realistically teams like Brentford aren't going to win anything, so they rely on buying players ,developing ,then selling them on, At 35 or 40m there's not much room for profit especially as I'm sure we'll insert a sell on clause. Even in this ridiculous market there's not many players sold 50m+ Makes perfect sense to look abroad for cheaper options |
Brentford have an excellent track record for identifying players and I'd not be surprised if they look elsewhere as there is certainly more value to be had |  | |  |
| |