| Sarmiento 20:24 - Aug 2 with 1000 views | Nutkins_Return |
If the deal was good and we could get him relatively cheap £3-5 mil then I would be very happy to have him onboard if Omari is off. There is a value to him knowing exactly how we operate and the role he would need to do. He was just absolutely ideal in how he plays coming on because he was a bit blood and thunder in his approach.
A bit erratic but he's a really decent technical player and he'd absolutely love coming back.
A good replacement if we Omari/Hutchinson go. An no I don't want either to go. Obviously there are some other good options as well but Sarmiento has a bit of X factor about him and street fighter spirit. Yep, but of heart in this thinking but that's ok! [Post edited 2 Aug 20:25]
|  |
| |  |
| Sarmiento on 20:26 - Aug 2 with 971 views | homer_123 |
Agreed. |  |
| |
| Sarmiento on 20:57 - Aug 2 with 737 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
Not good enough. Need better |  |
| |
| Sarmiento on 20:59 - Aug 2 with 723 views | Nutkins_Return |
| Sarmiento on 20:57 - Aug 2 by TRUE_BLUE123 |
Not good enough. Need better |
But he's proven to be good enough for us. He was excellent. He didn't have to start regularly to make a big impact. In those positions you'd have to spend £20-30 mil to get players ahead of what we have.
CM is where we spend the big money. And striker arguably. | |
| |
| Sarmiento on 21:18 - Aug 2 with 621 views | BarcaBlue |
| Sarmiento on 20:59 - Aug 2 by Nutkins_Return |
But he's proven to be good enough for us. He was excellent. He didn't have to start regularly to make a big impact. In those positions you'd have to spend £20-30 mil to get players ahead of what we have.
CM is where we spend the big money. And striker arguably. |
I don't think he was excellent. Positionally he was all over the place. KM didn't seem to trust him as a starter and it appears the same happened at Burnley. Just too chaotic imho. |  | | |
| Sarmiento on 21:18 - Aug 2 with 613 views | Clutch |
I didnt think he was great last time, but if hes matured now and is more consistent then he would be a good backup. |  | | |
| Sarmiento on 21:19 - Aug 2 with 607 views | Swansea_Blue |
Nope. Only if he can play CM, which he can’t. Another time if we didn’t ready have 2,000 proven AMs then maybe. |  |
| |
| Sarmiento on 21:19 - Aug 2 with 588 views | FrimleyBlue |
I'd take the 35 for hutch and spend it on dibling. |  |
| |
| Sarmiento on 21:22 - Aug 2 with 567 views | BarcaBlue |
| Sarmiento on 21:19 - Aug 2 by FrimleyBlue |
I'd take the 35 for hutch and spend it on dibling. |
It's not Football Manager. Dibling wouldn't swap Soton for Ipswich and I doubt 35 million would convince Southampton either. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Sarmiento on 21:24 - Aug 2 with 547 views | Nutkins_Return |
| Sarmiento on 21:19 - Aug 2 by Swansea_Blue |
Nope. Only if he can play CM, which he can’t. Another time if we didn’t ready have 2,000 proven AMs then maybe. |
Broadhead and Omari are not CMs. We will need both. | |
| |
| Sarmiento on 21:25 - Aug 2 with 511 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Sarmiento on 21:22 - Aug 2 by BarcaBlue |
It's not Football Manager. Dibling wouldn't swap Soton for Ipswich and I doubt 35 million would convince Southampton either. |
Obv I know he wouldn't. Was in jest
But. If dibling is more than 35. Why is hutch different? | |
| |
| Sarmiento on 07:23 - Aug 3 with 138 views | PioneerBlue |
This seems way too obvious but if it’s doable it’s a simple swap for an older player on a 1 year contract for a younger player with upside potential. They are both ball carriers Magic and Broady. Magic is arguably a bit more robust in the tackle. | |
| |
| Sarmiento on 07:31 - Aug 3 with 94 views | franz_tyson |
I'd say he's more of a Broadhead replacement because he's more of a bench player. Hes nowhere near a Omari replacement.Take out the Southampton goal.... and many would have forgotten about him. I say no...we can do better. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
