Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
“Bad Recruitment” 23:37 - Dec 3 with 899 viewsChris_ITFC

I don’t buy it. This is all about tactics and man management.

Look at who we’ve signed in the last 2 years. They weren’t good enough for the Premier League, but this squad absolutely should be now.

Proven Championship performers:
Clarke (Sunderland)
Philogene (Hull)
Greaves (Hull)
O’Shea (WBA)
Szmodics (Blackburn)
Nunez (*******)
Akpom (Boro)
Kipre (WBA)
Furlong (WBA)
Ogbene (Rotherham)
Muric (Burnley)
Palmer (WBA)
Townsend (WBA)

No Championship experience, but proven quality:
Walle Egeli
Matusiwa
Cajuste

Sold for profit:
Hutchinson
Delap

None of the above:
Azon
McAteer
Johnson
Young
Button

(excl. Prem loans)

Poll: Who do you want to win tonight?

0
“Bad Recruitment” on 23:54 - Dec 3 with 822 viewsbadadski

It’s bad recruitment

What player fits in with the mould of what was stated we needed when bullied like little school boys against Newcastle. Pace and physicality. Apart from hirst not one of our midfield or strikers is above 6ft. Not one of our midfielders or strikers has get past your defender pace.

We have a few that can take on the man and get a few yards from them due their technical ability but beyond that we have recruited a team of mid to high technical players with average pace. We can’t break the lines and we can’t get in behind teams like we used to so will have to rely on battling it out, slogging it out and hope that our possession game gets us enough opportunities to put one away which is proving hard at the moment due to how we lack a clinical cutting edge for what ever reason
[Post edited 3 Dec 23:56]
2
“Bad Recruitment” on 00:38 - Dec 4 with 735 viewsJoey_Joe_Joe_Junior

There’s a very big link between tactics and recruitment!

Poll: What was Connor Chaplin’s best injury time celebration?

0
“Bad Recruitment” on 02:51 - Dec 4 with 647 viewsWacko

“Bad Recruitment” on 23:54 - Dec 3 by badadski

It’s bad recruitment

What player fits in with the mould of what was stated we needed when bullied like little school boys against Newcastle. Pace and physicality. Apart from hirst not one of our midfield or strikers is above 6ft. Not one of our midfielders or strikers has get past your defender pace.

We have a few that can take on the man and get a few yards from them due their technical ability but beyond that we have recruited a team of mid to high technical players with average pace. We can’t break the lines and we can’t get in behind teams like we used to so will have to rely on battling it out, slogging it out and hope that our possession game gets us enough opportunities to put one away which is proving hard at the moment due to how we lack a clinical cutting edge for what ever reason
[Post edited 3 Dec 23:56]


Cajuste and Taylor are both over 6ft

Poll: Who would you rather see lose their job?

0
“Bad Recruitment” on 06:54 - Dec 4 with 565 viewsSteve_M

It's less the individuals as the imbalance of the squad: four right backs, no direct cover for Matusiwa or Leif, no working option at 10 and a striker short for the fourth season in a row.

Poll: When are the squad numbers out?
Blog: Cycle of Hurt

2
“Bad Recruitment” on 07:23 - Dec 4 with 511 viewsMatt_Netherlands

Hmmm disagree…

If you buy a fillet steak, prawn tempura, onion bhajis, Camembert and bbq sauce…. It doesn’t make a roast dinner.
3
“Bad Recruitment” on 07:57 - Dec 4 with 460 viewsBluemike31

“Bad Recruitment” on 07:23 - Dec 4 by Matt_Netherlands

Hmmm disagree…

If you buy a fillet steak, prawn tempura, onion bhajis, Camembert and bbq sauce…. It doesn’t make a roast dinner.


Agree entirely with the OP, it's not down to the recruitment, it's down to tactics and coaching. Rotation, rotation rotation, square pegs in round holes, the way we have completely nullified Leif Davis as the assist king is a prime example of poor tactics.
1
“Bad Recruitment” on 07:59 - Dec 4 with 458 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

It is bad recruitment if they don't fit the system.
[Post edited 4 Dec 7:59]

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

1
“Bad Recruitment” on 08:00 - Dec 4 with 443 viewsBluemike31

“Bad Recruitment” on 07:59 - Dec 4 by Marshalls_Mullet

It is bad recruitment if they don't fit the system.
[Post edited 4 Dec 7:59]


Then change the system, it's mind numbing anyway.
2
Login to get fewer ads

“Bad Recruitment” on 08:07 - Dec 4 with 411 viewsChris_ITFC

“Bad Recruitment” on 07:23 - Dec 4 by Matt_Netherlands

Hmmm disagree…

If you buy a fillet steak, prawn tempura, onion bhajis, Camembert and bbq sauce…. It doesn’t make a roast dinner.


Yes, but you can serve a bloody delicious 3 courses with all those ingredients.

Or you can blend it badly and come up with something revolting.

Poll: Who do you want to win tonight?

0
“Bad Recruitment” on 08:10 - Dec 4 with 374 viewsChris_ITFC

“Bad Recruitment” on 06:54 - Dec 4 by Steve_M

It's less the individuals as the imbalance of the squad: four right backs, no direct cover for Matusiwa or Leif, no working option at 10 and a striker short for the fourth season in a row.


Having right backs sat in the stand doesn’t affect performances.
Having Leif play every minute doesn’t either. He’s always done that.
And you can’t have us short at 10 and striker; Akpom is one or the other.

The hard truth is, all these expensive pieces could be put together in a better way.

Poll: Who do you want to win tonight?

1
“Bad Recruitment” on 08:12 - Dec 4 with 353 viewsChris_ITFC

“Bad Recruitment” on 07:59 - Dec 4 by Marshalls_Mullet

It is bad recruitment if they don't fit the system.
[Post edited 4 Dec 7:59]


But they were bought with the manager’s blessing to play his system. And the system can also be changed, as blasphemous and incomprehensible as that is.

If he can’t get a tune out of that level of proven quality, that’s tactics.

Poll: Who do you want to win tonight?

2
“Bad Recruitment” on 08:20 - Dec 4 with 307 viewsReusersTown

What have those proven Championship performers ever achieved in the Championship. Can't see much of a history of winning there.
0
“Bad Recruitment” on 08:40 - Dec 4 with 259 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

“Bad Recruitment” on 08:00 - Dec 4 by Bluemike31

Then change the system, it's mind numbing anyway.


I don't run the team.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

0
“Bad Recruitment” on 08:42 - Dec 4 with 244 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

“Bad Recruitment” on 08:12 - Dec 4 by Chris_ITFC

But they were bought with the manager’s blessing to play his system. And the system can also be changed, as blasphemous and incomprehensible as that is.

If he can’t get a tune out of that level of proven quality, that’s tactics.


I think they are good players, I'm just saying it's bad recruitment if the players and system are not aligned somewhere along the way.

I think recruitment and coaching share the blame.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

0
“Bad Recruitment” on 08:50 - Dec 4 with 211 viewsTownieRob

Proven Championship players should give you stability at this level. Unfortunately, we signed a lot of these lads with the idea that we’d be ‘relentless in our approach’ to the Premier League. As I said in another post, the only two signings who actually made the transition are now, quite rightly, back in the Premier League this season.

You can dress it up however you like, but the truth is there in front of us. What we’re seeing on the pitch strongly suggests the recruitment just hasn’t been good enough.

And if you want an example of how it should be done, just look at Sunderland. They’re absolutely flying, that’s what 'good' recruitment looks like.
-1
“Bad Recruitment” on 08:54 - Dec 4 with 197 viewspablo_canooga

“Bad Recruitment” on 08:50 - Dec 4 by TownieRob

Proven Championship players should give you stability at this level. Unfortunately, we signed a lot of these lads with the idea that we’d be ‘relentless in our approach’ to the Premier League. As I said in another post, the only two signings who actually made the transition are now, quite rightly, back in the Premier League this season.

You can dress it up however you like, but the truth is there in front of us. What we’re seeing on the pitch strongly suggests the recruitment just hasn’t been good enough.

And if you want an example of how it should be done, just look at Sunderland. They’re absolutely flying, that’s what 'good' recruitment looks like.


TomTheWriter nailed it yesterday.

Problematic Recruitment by TomTheWriter 3 Dec 11:09
For me the player recruitment isn’t the problem, it’s the profile recruitment.

The players are good. There’s almost 100 goals between Akpom, Sammie, Jaden and Clarke from a few seasons back. On paper the majority of signings are good because they dominated the league with other teams. The problem is they don’t fit the rigid way we want to play.

It’s the same with Southampton. They took Azaz and Fellows very late, 2 of the best in the Champ for Boro and W.Brom. They struggled hugely under Still, but in the 5 games since his sacking Azaz has 5 goals and 1 assist. Good player, wrong style, now clearly the right style.

We either need McKenna to play in a way that suits the players, or you choose someone else. I don’t want us spending another £150m without one of the above changing

1
“Bad Recruitment” on 09:00 - Dec 4 with 165 viewsbobbyramsey

“Bad Recruitment” on 08:50 - Dec 4 by TownieRob

Proven Championship players should give you stability at this level. Unfortunately, we signed a lot of these lads with the idea that we’d be ‘relentless in our approach’ to the Premier League. As I said in another post, the only two signings who actually made the transition are now, quite rightly, back in the Premier League this season.

You can dress it up however you like, but the truth is there in front of us. What we’re seeing on the pitch strongly suggests the recruitment just hasn’t been good enough.

And if you want an example of how it should be done, just look at Sunderland. They’re absolutely flying, that’s what 'good' recruitment looks like.


Sorry for the down vote, fat fingers.....
1
“Bad Recruitment” on 09:04 - Dec 4 with 146 viewsWright1

“Bad Recruitment” on 08:00 - Dec 4 by Bluemike31

Then change the system, it's mind numbing anyway.


Yeah it seemed well boring when it rocketed us to double promotion playing free flowing attacking football.
1
“Bad Recruitment” on 09:32 - Dec 4 with 104 viewsPinewoodblue

Mcateer (Leicester) Young (Watford) & Button(with 6 different clubs) all have Championship experience.

Recruitment this summer wasn’t restricted to players there were several departures from McKenna’s backroom team. Not bad recruitment but recruitment KMc would rather not have had to make.

2023 year of destiny
Poll: Dickhead "Noun" a stupid, irritating, or ridiculous man.

0
“Bad Recruitment” on 10:11 - Dec 4 with 15 viewsTownieRob

“Bad Recruitment” on 08:54 - Dec 4 by pablo_canooga

TomTheWriter nailed it yesterday.

Problematic Recruitment by TomTheWriter 3 Dec 11:09
For me the player recruitment isn’t the problem, it’s the profile recruitment.

The players are good. There’s almost 100 goals between Akpom, Sammie, Jaden and Clarke from a few seasons back. On paper the majority of signings are good because they dominated the league with other teams. The problem is they don’t fit the rigid way we want to play.

It’s the same with Southampton. They took Azaz and Fellows very late, 2 of the best in the Champ for Boro and W.Brom. They struggled hugely under Still, but in the 5 games since his sacking Azaz has 5 goals and 1 assist. Good player, wrong style, now clearly the right style.

We either need McKenna to play in a way that suits the players, or you choose someone else. I don’t want us spending another £150m without one of the above changing



So it is bad recruitment then, isn’t it? We’ve signed players who don’t actually fit the system we’re trying to play.

It all looked a bit of a mismatch. You’ve got lads suited to counter-attacking football (SS), others who look like they need a two-up-top setup (Akpom) and a couple who essentially want to play in the same position (wide left).

I get the arguments people are making, but for me it still doesn’t add up. The recruitment looks messy, the pieces don’t fit together and the result is what we’re watching every week. Far from ideal, and we’re now feeling the consequences of it.
0
“Bad Recruitment” on 10:17 - Dec 4 with 1 viewsBluemike31

“Bad Recruitment” on 09:04 - Dec 4 by Wright1

Yeah it seemed well boring when it rocketed us to double promotion playing free flowing attacking football.


Live in the past for as long as you like, it isn't working anymore, we've been sussed because we are so rigid in our One dimensional approach.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025