| How damning could this be on 06:04 - Dec 24 with 356 views | Benters |
| How damning could this be on 17:37 - Dec 23 by FromReuserWithLove |
is there still a way we can blame an immigrant though? |
They come form another World or something and I don’t mean Wolverhampton. |  |
|  |
| How damning could this be on 06:05 - Dec 24 with 351 views | Benters |
| How damning could this be on 02:50 - Dec 24 by Ryorry |
What a vile, contemptible comment. It speaks volumes about you.
Oh - and btw, you'll never succeed in bullying me off here, no matter how much defamatory bs you post about me. [Post edited 24 Dec 3:34]
|
Bravo. | |
| |
| How damning could this be on 08:02 - Dec 24 with 281 views | DanTheMan |
Seems you can unredact the Epstein files by just copy and pasting the blocks into another program.
More stellar work from the FBI, really had their best on this. |  |
| |
| How damning could this be on 09:09 - Dec 24 with 224 views | baxterbasics |
Reputation wise I don't think it can get much worse for him. He's already at rock bottom there, the public have made up their mind and he's effectively cut off from the family business like Fredo Corleone.
The only way I think he might end up more 'damned' is if something appears that leads to legal action that could see him convicted or even jailed. Which seems unlikely. |  |
| |
| How damning could this be on 09:19 - Dec 24 with 210 views | Swansea_Blue |
| How damning could this be on 18:05 - Dec 23 by DarkBrandon |
Preferential? Who has received worse treatment than him? Who has been prosecuted? |
Who’s been treated worse than him? The victims who haven’t been able to at least get some sort of justice while their abusers, including Andrew walk free. |  |
| |
| How damning could this be on 09:33 - Dec 24 with 181 views | MattinLondon |
| How damning could this be on 22:27 - Dec 23 by vapour_trail |
Paedohile protected by the second monarch in a row.
GSTK. |
To be fair, Charles seems to be taking a harder line over Andrew than what his mummy did. |  | | |
| How damning could this be on 09:40 - Dec 24 with 157 views | Zx1988 |
| How damning could this be on 09:33 - Dec 24 by MattinLondon |
To be fair, Charles seems to be taking a harder line over Andrew than what his mummy did. |
It's probably a very difficult balancing act for Charles.
Doing enough to publicly punish Andrew, whilst not doing so much that Andrew decides his interests are better served by p*ssing into the tent. |  |
| |
| How damning could this be on 09:49 - Dec 24 with 149 views | baxterbasics |
| How damning could this be on 09:40 - Dec 24 by Zx1988 |
It's probably a very difficult balancing act for Charles.
Doing enough to publicly punish Andrew, whilst not doing so much that Andrew decides his interests are better served by p*ssing into the tent. |
I'm not sure what those bashing the monarch (current and previous) think they should realistically do more in the circumstances. Bearing in mind AMW hasn't been convicted of anything. Do they expect him to be thrown in the tower, pending beheading?
The criticism notably tends to come from those who are already anti-monarch anyway. Same as the whole "team Sussex Vs team Wales" nonsense. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| How damning could this be on 10:35 - Dec 24 with 126 views | positivity |
| How damning could this be on 09:49 - Dec 24 by baxterbasics |
I'm not sure what those bashing the monarch (current and previous) think they should realistically do more in the circumstances. Bearing in mind AMW hasn't been convicted of anything. Do they expect him to be thrown in the tower, pending beheading?
The criticism notably tends to come from those who are already anti-monarch anyway. Same as the whole "team Sussex Vs team Wales" nonsense. |
the previous monarch could have not paid off his accusers and let it go to trial.
for my money, charles has been far stronger fwiw | |
| |
| How damning could this be on 10:40 - Dec 24 with 119 views | MattinLondon |
| How damning could this be on 10:35 - Dec 24 by positivity |
the previous monarch could have not paid off his accusers and let it go to trial.
for my money, charles has been far stronger fwiw |
Agreed - when it comes to Andrew, Charles seems to have a stronger moral backbone compared to the late Queen. | | | |
| How damning could this be on 10:43 - Dec 24 with 102 views | WeWereZombies |
| How damning could this be on 10:40 - Dec 24 by MattinLondon |
Agreed - when it comes to Andrew, Charles seems to have a stronger moral backbone compared to the late Queen. |
Or it could just be that a brother is a very meaningful but not without judgement relationship whereas mother to offspring is usually unconditional. |  |
| |
| How damning could this be on 11:05 - Dec 24 with 84 views | Zx1988 |
| How damning could this be on 18:05 - Dec 23 by DarkBrandon |
Preferential? Who has received worse treatment than him? Who has been prosecuted? |
In terms of preferential treatment, here's a quote from an article from the BBC today ( https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cewjrvn5795o):
"[F]urther documents show that the US Department of Justice formally sought to question Andrew, asking in April 2020 for the UK government to assist in getting him to give evidence in cases linked to Epstein.
In the event that he would not voluntarily give evidence, the US authorities asked their UK counterparts to compel him."
If it had been you or me who had been the subject of such a request, you know precisely what would have happened had we chosen not to voluntarily comply. | |
| |
| How damning could this be on 11:18 - Dec 24 with 61 views | WeWereZombies |
| How damning could this be on 11:05 - Dec 24 by Zx1988 |
In terms of preferential treatment, here's a quote from an article from the BBC today ( https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cewjrvn5795o):
"[F]urther documents show that the US Department of Justice formally sought to question Andrew, asking in April 2020 for the UK government to assist in getting him to give evidence in cases linked to Epstein.
In the event that he would not voluntarily give evidence, the US authorities asked their UK counterparts to compel him."
If it had been you or me who had been the subject of such a request, you know precisely what would have happened had we chosen not to voluntarily comply. |
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/06/uk/us-diplomat-wife-intl-gbr | |
| |
| How damning could this be on 11:28 - Dec 24 with 47 views | Zx1988 |
That one did come to mind whilst I was typing my post but, by the letter of the law, she benefited from diplomatic immunity.
Whilst the monarch personally benefits from Sovereign Immunity, it applies only to the Head of State, and not to any other family members.
Similarly, now that Prince Nonce is now just Plain Ol' Nonce, I guess that any immunities that he may have tenuously claimed no longer apply, should anyone want to pursue a second bite of the cherry. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
