Forum | Now that Humpries has gone by GeoffSentence

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Now that Humpries has gone 19:59 - Jan 9 with 1312 views

Who will take the club developed player spot in the match day squad

	Don't boil a kettle on a boat.
Poll:	The best Williams to play for Town

Now that Humpries has gone on 20:00 - Jan 9 with 1309 views

Wacko

We don’t need one. We’re exempt

https://www.eadt.co.uk/sport/25745086.ipswich-town-efl-rule-means-club-developed

[Post edited 9 Jan 20:01]

Poll:

Who would you rather see lose their job?

Now that Humpries has gone on 01:12 - Jan 10 with 1000 views

itfc1108

It would be a sad day for the club if we were to use this loophole.
I would have Barbrook in the squad, and keep him to train with the first team and cover for Azor.
It could be a very useful 6 months of learning for him.

-2

Now that Humpries has gone on 07:41 - Jan 10 with 773 views

lurcher

Now that Humpries has gone on 01:12 - Jan 10 by itfc1108
It would be a sad day for the club if we were to use this loophole. I would have Barbrook in the squad, and keep him to train with the first team and cover for Azor. It could be a very useful 6 months of learning for him.

Members of the youth team already train with the 1st team on a regular basis. It is the only way they can hold 11 Vs 11 games.

Now that Humpries has gone on 08:31 - Jan 10 with 639 views

Cheltenham_Blue

Now that Humpries has gone on 01:12 - Jan 10 by itfc1108
It would be a sad day for the club if we were to use this loophole. I would have Barbrook in the squad, and keep him to train with the first team and cover for Azor. It could be a very useful 6 months of learning for him.

Why would it be a 'sad day for the club'?

We've just got Cat one for the first time ever, and why would we want to hamstring McKenna by putting a player weaker than Humpheys into the squad?

Barbrook might come good eventually, but at the moment, he's not on the level of Humph.

Poll:

Is it more annoying when builders

Now that Humpries has gone on 08:40 - Jan 10 with 621 views

redrickstuhaart

Now that Humpries has gone on 08:31 - Jan 10 by Cheltenham_Blue
Why would it be a 'sad day for the club'? We've just got Cat one for the first time ever, and why would we want to hamstring McKenna by putting a player weaker than Humpheys into the squad? Barbrook might come good eventually, but at the moment, he's not on the level of Humph.

Seems a fair and proper rule. Given that Cat 1s and prem clubs literally poach all the strongest talent, for very modest fees, from lower clubs as a result of the way the regulations are set up, It would be extremely harsh to let the big clubs take all the homegrown talent for peanuts and then penalise small clubs for not having that homegrown talent on the bench...

Now that Humpries has gone on 09:28 - Jan 10 with 506 views

cressi

Now that Humpries has gone on 01:12 - Jan 10 by itfc1108
It would be a sad day for the club if we were to use this loophole. I would have Barbrook in the squad, and keep him to train with the first team and cover for Azor. It could be a very useful 6 months of learning for him.

It's not about feeling sad it's about getting the best squad possible and getting promoted.

Now that Humpries has gone on 09:58 - Jan 10 with 419 views

MattinLondon

Now that Humpries has gone on 08:40 - Jan 10 by redrickstuhaart
Seems a fair and proper rule. Given that Cat 1s and prem clubs literally poach all the strongest talent, for very modest fees, from lower clubs as a result of the way the regulations are set up, It would be extremely harsh to let the big clubs take all the homegrown talent for peanuts and then penalise small clubs for not having that homegrown talent on the bench...

Can a Cat 1 academy still poach youngsters from another Category 1 academy?

Now that Humpries has gone on 10:56 - Jan 10 with 349 views

Nthsuffolkblue

Now that Humpries has gone on 20:00 - Jan 9 by Wacko
We don’t need one. We’re exempt https://www.eadt.co.uk/sport/25745086.ipswich-town-efl-rule-means-club-developed [Post edited 9 Jan 20:01]

So that does leave us depending on Premier League clubs not selling on those players to League 1 or below or abroad. I guess they are not at all likely to do so.

Poll:	How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Now that Humpries has gone on 10:57 - Jan 10 with 337 views

Nthsuffolkblue

I think we haven't had a club developed player in most of our match day squads all season anyway. I think the rule (without the clause) was having one named in the registered 25-man-squad.

Poll:	How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Now that Humpries has gone on 11:00 - Jan 10 with 326 views

positivity

Now that Humpries has gone on 10:56 - Jan 10 by Nthsuffolkblue
So that does leave us depending on Premier League clubs not selling on those players to League 1 or below or abroad. I guess they are not at all likely to do so.

that's just a backstop if we don't name baggott or clarke or barbrook in our 25 man squad though?

i can't see us not naming barbrook as he can't play anywhere else this season (or is he still underage?)

Poll:

do you do judo and/or do you do voodoo?

Who is "Humpries" anyway? on 11:05 - Jan 10 with 299 views

Nthsuffolkblue

Is he a relative of Humphreys as quite a few of the letters match?

Poll:	How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Now that Humpries has gone on 12:21 - Jan 10 with 187 views

GeoffSentence

Now that Humpries has gone on 20:00 - Jan 9 by Wacko
We don’t need one. We’re exempt https://www.eadt.co.uk/sport/25745086.ipswich-town-efl-rule-means-club-developed [Post edited 9 Jan 20:01]

I had no idea thst rule existed.

	Don't boil a kettle on a boat.
Poll:	The best Williams to play for Town

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread