By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Whatever the answer, I hope it gets resolved asap. The poor, poor parents of those deceased babies, Lucy's parents, and Lucy herself all need this whole affair done and dusted.
There is an element of unavoidable tragedy about how much attention and time the case takes up when one of the principal factors was understaffing, and in the wake of Steven Wright's confession on a conviction that was made from overwhelming circumstantial evidence we have to wonder what to make of the circumstantial evidence in this case.
Interesting observation from this article.
" We were understaffed - that's generally true in most departments on most wards on the NHS," he said. "But we had had those same staffing pressures before 2015 and 2016 and we'd not had those increased deaths then."
0
Lucy Letby. The doubt simply doesn't go away.... on 16:43 - Feb 5 with 282 views
Just finished the Netflix doc while “working” from home.
Turning into a really messy situation by all accounts, the fact we work on a “beyond reasonable doubt” protocol - but there is an amount of doubt that seems to be growing over this.
For the record I still think she’s guilty, but I think she deserves a re trial.
0
Lucy Letby. The doubt simply doesn't go away.... on 19:45 - Feb 5 with 241 views
Much of the evidence might be circumstantial, but that doesn’t mean it’s not credible.
If there’s been a big miscarriage of justice then that’s obviously awful, I find it hard to believe though when you look at the substance of the evidence against her, circumstantial or otherwise.
I find it odd that her defence only called up the hospital cleaner, why wouldn’t they call someone medical or technical if the arguments against her were so paper thin?
0
Lucy Letby. The doubt simply doesn't go away.... on 20:00 - Feb 5 with 223 views
Lucy Letby. The doubt simply doesn't go away.... on 19:45 - Feb 5 by MrPotatoHead
Much of the evidence might be circumstantial, but that doesn’t mean it’s not credible.
If there’s been a big miscarriage of justice then that’s obviously awful, I find it hard to believe though when you look at the substance of the evidence against her, circumstantial or otherwise.
I find it odd that her defence only called up the hospital cleaner, why wouldn’t they call someone medical or technical if the arguments against her were so paper thin?
The bulk of it has actually been discredited by numerous experts at the top of their fields in statistics, neonatal medicine, anaesthesia, analysis of drugs including insulin, etc. etc.
Suggest you read, listen and view more widely, including previous threads on this on here. It’s all out there.
Lucy Letby. The doubt simply doesn't go away.... on 20:00 - Feb 5 by Ryorry
The bulk of it has actually been discredited by numerous experts at the top of their fields in statistics, neonatal medicine, anaesthesia, analysis of drugs including insulin, etc. etc.
Suggest you read, listen and view more widely, including previous threads on this on here. It’s all out there.
And I suggest you don’t make assumptions about how familiar people are with the case.
Why didn’t her defence call up any experts? what was the purpose of calling the cleaner to the box?
1
Lucy Letby. The doubt simply doesn't go away.... on 20:14 - Feb 5 with 200 views
Lucy Letby. The doubt simply doesn't go away.... on 20:10 - Feb 5 by MrPotatoHead
And I suggest you don’t make assumptions about how familiar people are with the case.
Why didn’t her defence call up any experts? what was the purpose of calling the cleaner to the box?
Your ”familiarity with the case doesn’t seem to have extended as far as reading the first page of this thread, where your question was answered multiple times.
Lucy Letby. The doubt simply doesn't go away.... on 20:14 - Feb 5 by Ryorry
Your ”familiarity with the case doesn’t seem to have extended as far as reading the first page of this thread, where your question was answered multiple times.
There are more reliable sources than you spouting nonsense on a TWTD thread.
-1
Lucy Letby. The doubt simply doesn't go away.... on 21:04 - Feb 5 with 147 views
Lucy Letby. The doubt simply doesn't go away.... on 21:44 - Feb 5 by bartyg
Repeating that there are hundreds of experts that agree with you without giving any sources is very compelling
Sorry, I made the mistake of assuming that everyone replying to my “nonsense” had gone into the case sufficiently themselves to be aware of the mass of evidence that has been widely available in the public domain for the past 6-12 months.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
