| Kmac subs 09:49 - Feb 23 with 1147 views | LeoMuff |
Chasing the game on Sat we swapped Akpom for Matusiwa, anyone see how we were set up at that point ? I couldn’t see on Town TV and tbh had given up.
Seemed like a weird one. |  |
| |  |
| Kmac subs on 10:02 - Feb 23 with 1053 views | WestStanderLaLaLa |
Nunez went deeper. Made sense to me. |  |
| |
| Kmac subs on 10:23 - Feb 23 with 947 views | Vaughan8 |
So you think bringing on a more attacking player for a more denfensive player when you're losing is a weird sub?
Our front and midfield players are quitre fluid so I'm, not sure why you think its weird.
Whatever you think of Akpom, he is porbably more likely to score than Matusiwa. |  | | |
| When he made that sub…. on 10:28 - Feb 23 with 918 views | Bloots |
….I briefly thought he was going to change shape and have an extra attacker when we needed it most.
But he just told Nunez to sit in the middle and Akpom went to the 10.
Same formation, no impact, same outcome.
It’s things like this that frustrate me about KM. |  |
| "The holy trinity” - TWTD User (Jan 2026) |
| |
| It makes very little difference…. on 10:31 - Feb 23 with 886 views | Bloots |
| Kmac subs on 10:23 - Feb 23 by Vaughan8 |
So you think bringing on a more attacking player for a more denfensive player when you're losing is a weird sub?
Our front and midfield players are quitre fluid so I'm, not sure why you think its weird.
Whatever you think of Akpom, he is porbably more likely to score than Matusiwa. |
….if you don’t change the formation and just stick to the same patterns of play but with different players.
It doesn’t matter what their attacking ability is if they are just asked to perform “the role”. | |
| "The holy trinity” - TWTD User (Jan 2026) |
| |
| When he made that sub…. on 10:31 - Feb 23 with 877 views | Ace_High1 |
| When he made that sub…. on 10:28 - Feb 23 by Bloots |
….I briefly thought he was going to change shape and have an extra attacker when we needed it most.
But he just told Nunez to sit in the middle and Akpom went to the 10.
Same formation, no impact, same outcome.
It’s things like this that frustrate me about KM. |
Yes sometimes lets go 2 up top, chuck the ball into the box.
Win at all costs. |  | | |
| Kmac subs on 11:10 - Feb 23 with 733 views | LeoMuff |
| Kmac subs on 10:23 - Feb 23 by Vaughan8 |
So you think bringing on a more attacking player for a more denfensive player when you're losing is a weird sub?
Our front and midfield players are quitre fluid so I'm, not sure why you think its weird.
Whatever you think of Akpom, he is porbably more likely to score than Matusiwa. |
Maybe weird was the wrong choice of words, not a sub I can recall us ever making. | |
| |
| It makes very little difference…. on 11:34 - Feb 23 with 655 views | FrimleyBlue |
| It makes very little difference…. on 10:31 - Feb 23 by Bloots |
….if you don’t change the formation and just stick to the same patterns of play but with different players.
It doesn’t matter what their attacking ability is if they are just asked to perform “the role”. |
When plan A doesnt work you just try and do a better job at plan A. |  |
| |
| When he made that sub…. on 15:05 - Feb 23 with 303 views | norfsufblue |
| When he made that sub…. on 10:31 - Feb 23 by Ace_High1 |
Yes sometimes lets go 2 up top, chuck the ball into the box.
Win at all costs. |
Couldn't see the harm in just sticking Greaves up front with Hirst and just lumping it in to try and create a bit of chaos .... its worked against us on a number of occasions! |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Kmac subs on 16:27 - Feb 23 with 150 views | Pinewoodblue |
| Kmac subs on 10:23 - Feb 23 by Vaughan8 |
So you think bringing on a more attacking player for a more denfensive player when you're losing is a weird sub?
Our front and midfield players are quitre fluid so I'm, not sure why you think its weird.
Whatever you think of Akpom, he is porbably more likely to score than Matusiwa. |
The scores were level when that change was made.
It might have been better to strengthen midfield with an extra player rather than stick to plan A. With 20 minutes plus added time to go & Wrexham getting more of the ball there was time to get a breakaway chance, so keeping them out ought to have been our priority. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
