| USA 250 20:05 - Jul 5 with 652 views | Perublue |
I was just thinking last night on the toilet about if they’d never left the UK would they have ended up now like Australia,Canada or/and New Zealand and how that would have changed the last couple of centuries ?
Thoughts
There’s a thesis for someone to get their teeth into at Uni [Post edited 5 Jul 20:07]
|  |
| |  |
| USA 250 on 20:10 - Jul 5 with 600 views | Mullet |
I sense they'd be multiple countries of various sides and culturally different. |  |
| |
| USA 250 on 20:12 - Jul 5 with 588 views | Perublue |
| USA 250 on 20:10 - Jul 5 by Mullet |
I sense they'd be multiple countries of various sides and culturally different. |
Interesting… yes I can see that definitely | |
| |
| USA 250 on 20:34 - Jul 5 with 517 views | Churchman |
| USA 250 on 20:10 - Jul 5 by Mullet |
I sense they'd be multiple countries of various sides and culturally different. |
I’ll go with that. In my limited experience it’s countries within a country. |  | | |
| USA 250 on 21:35 - Jul 5 with 438 views | You_Bloo_Right |
| USA 250 on 20:34 - Jul 5 by Churchman |
I’ll go with that. In my limited experience it’s countries within a country. |
A bit like the old USSR then. |  |
| |
| USA 250 on 21:46 - Jul 5 with 396 views | ArnoldMoorhen |
The big questions are whether the UK would have been overstretched and thus easy pickings for Napoleon Bonaparte, and secondly, had the UK overcome that hurdle, would an American Empire have held sufficient attraction that the Imperial land grab under Victoria wouldn't have happened in Africa and India?
TL:DR baseball would never have been invented, and the Colony of Virginia would be the current Cricket T20 World Champions. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
