| The Supercomputer has spoken 09:40 - Jul 21 with 2463 views | dirtyboy |
Look away now Darkhorse lol!
Predicted final Premier League 2026/27 table
1: Arsenal - 86 pts
2: Manchester City -78 pts
3: Liverpool - 75 pts
4: Manchester United - 68 pts
5: Chelsea - 66 pts
6: Aston Villa - 63 pts
7: Spurs - 63 pts
8: Newcastle United - 57 pts
9: Brighton - 55 pts
10: Bournemouth - 53 pts
11: Brentford - 49 pts
12: Everton - 47 pts
13: Fulham - 43 pts
14: Leeds United - 42 pts
15: Crystal Palace- 41 pts
16: Sunderland - 40pts
17: Nottingham Forest - 36 pts
18: Hull City - 33 pts
19: Ipswich Town - 27 pts
20: Coventry City - 24 pts |  | | |  |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 09:42 - Jul 21 with 2399 views | GavTWTD |
Well, I for one don't think it's very super. |  |
| |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 09:48 - Jul 21 with 2280 views | Deano69 |
Hull 6 points clear of us? Hmmm |  |
| |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 09:50 - Jul 21 with 2253 views | eireblue |
No, do it again. |  | | |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 09:52 - Jul 21 with 2199 views | dirtyboy |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 09:42 - Jul 21 by GavTWTD |
Well, I for one don't think it's very super. |
I have absolutely no idea how this super computer works, but I suspect it's pretty meaningless at this stage, given few teams actually know who'll be starting their first games.
Not completely surprised by the bottom 6, other than Forest who I think Glasner will take on a step.
Otherwise, seeing us, Cov, Hull, Sunderland and Palace wouldn't be a surprise, just have to hope we can edge the margins and finish above 3 of them.
I think Fulham could be the other one dragged down a bit. Leeds will be buoyed by their performances last season and I think they'll be strong enough to stay out of trouble. Farke is a good manager and has rightfully been given time to build them. | | | |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 09:52 - Jul 21 with 2202 views | Cotty |
1) The power of the computer isn't important
2) The algorithm it runs is extremely important
3) The data is just as, if not more important
4) We don't know what half of our first team will look like
5) We can safely ignore this |  | | |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 09:59 - Jul 21 with 2086 views | RetroBlue |
Hull above us ? Really ? |  |
| |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 10:09 - Jul 21 with 1923 views | Stourbridgeblue |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 09:42 - Jul 21 by GavTWTD |
Well, I for one don't think it's very super. |
What does the Osbourne 1.0. supercomputer predict ? |  |
| |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 10:16 - Jul 21 with 1820 views | Pinewoodblue |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 09:42 - Jul 21 by GavTWTD |
Well, I for one don't think it's very super. |
Super pooter sounds like an ABBA song. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 10:22 - Jul 21 with 1752 views | Axeldalai_lama |
Presumably based on current signings as they've basically just kept the logical. Order from last year with a few tweaks, and put spurs right up as they're the only team to have rebuilt so far. |  | | |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 10:22 - Jul 21 with 1748 views | Guthrum |
Upon what have they* based such a prediction at this stage in the summer, when the transfer window has barely got going?
Even if it's the teams as they stand, it's bizarre to put Hull so far ahead of us, when they've made only one signing to date.
* What's the source of this, by the way? |  |
| |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 10:24 - Jul 21 with 1729 views | GavTWTD |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 10:09 - Jul 21 by Stourbridgeblue |
What does the Osbourne 1.0. supercomputer predict ? |
I've got it working out PI.
Currently 5.32 | |
| |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 11:03 - Jul 21 with 1354 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
This is based on a predicted table generated 5 weeks ago (June 19th).
How likely does anyone think something generated that early in the summer will be particularly insightful? It was only a few days after the transfer window even opened. |  | | |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 11:17 - Jul 21 with 1245 views | dirtyboy |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 10:22 - Jul 21 by Guthrum |
Upon what have they* based such a prediction at this stage in the summer, when the transfer window has barely got going?
Even if it's the teams as they stand, it's bizarre to put Hull so far ahead of us, when they've made only one signing to date.
* What's the source of this, by the way? |
EADT, but I think it's the same one as Givemesport | | | |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 11:34 - Jul 21 with 1099 views | HighgateBlue |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 09:48 - Jul 21 by Deano69 |
Hull 6 points clear of us? Hmmm |
It can't possibly make a meaningful prediction at this stage.
However, I guess the reasons for Hull being above us are probably (1) the loss of a successful manager and the disruption that is likely to cause, and (2) the fact that we aren't as far forward as Hull in terms of making signings.
As I say, it can't be meaningful at this stage. Most identikit pundits will be saying that it's a negative that Kieran walked out, and I would tend to agree, although obviously GoN gets my whole hearted support. Not least because he wants to be here. |  | | |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 11:36 - Jul 21 with 1084 views | RIPbobby |
Supercomputers are mostly not great for predictions of things like this as there are too many variables. All the data they are using is based on the end of last season. Think of all the teams with new managers, players, team strategies etc. The only time I would take any notice of these are from October - December and from March until the season ends. That is about the only time the data will hold up as there will be new variables added in the other months and as soon as a manager is sacked or a players dies etc the data is changed. Not reliable. |  | | |
| The Supercomputer has spoken on 12:33 - Jul 21 with 914 views | mellowblue |
the Supercomputer had both Sunderland and Leeds to be relegated last season. Both survived okay. Also had Liverpool winning it, so is hardly infallible. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
