| Sell on clause on delap 18:26 - Aug 25 with 2299 views | BlueB0y |
Delap going for 45m to Forrest, rumoured when we sold him it was a 20% sell on. Is this based on profit or the total transfer value? |  | | |  |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:29 - Aug 25 with 2215 views | MK1 |
profit I believe |  |
| |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:30 - Aug 25 with 2190 views | positivity |
if we have a sell-on, it'll surely be based on profit.
don't think i've ever seen a deal based on total sale value, wouldn't make any financial sense, happy to be shown examples to the contrary! | |
| |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:35 - Aug 25 with 2066 views | J2BLUE |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:30 - Aug 25 by positivity |
if we have a sell-on, it'll surely be based on profit.
don't think i've ever seen a deal based on total sale value, wouldn't make any financial sense, happy to be shown examples to the contrary! |
Probably only ever been done for free transfers if a player is allowed to leave early. |  | | |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:43 - Aug 25 with 1946 views | positivity |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:35 - Aug 25 by J2BLUE |
Probably only ever been done for free transfers if a player is allowed to leave early. |
although if it's a free, then it's still a percentage of the profit! | |
| |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:48 - Aug 25 with 1859 views | ringwoodblue |
I think this is a good move for Delap. Chelsea is a bonkers team and as they proved last night, they have a wealth of forward options. He will get better opportunities at Forest.
Also means that Delap won’t be returning to Town which I honestly think would’ve been a mistake. |  |
| |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:52 - Aug 25 with 1758 views | BloomBlue |
Profit only, so based on rumour, that's £15m profit, 20% sell-on equals £3m. Plus knowing Chelsea's negotiating skills that's probably paid over 6 years, which means £500k per year. |  | | |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:53 - Aug 25 with 1722 views | PioneerBlue |
Lets say 15-20% of £15-20m = ~£2.25m - £4m range. If under the circumstances we were able to negotiate a higher percentage sell on we did very well. | |
| |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:54 - Aug 25 with 1711 views | pingu67 |
2 goals in 41 appearances and he's costing 45 million, that's 15 mil profit
To think Alan shearer cost Newcastle 15 million the game has gone | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:57 - Aug 25 with 1645 views | burnbudgiesburn |
Shows you how overpriced the striker market is though. If Emersonn bags 10 goals this season he'll be worth double. | | | |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:57 - Aug 25 with 1629 views | urbanpenguin |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:54 - Aug 25 by pingu67 |
2 goals in 41 appearances and he's costing 45 million, that's 15 mil profit
To think Alan shearer cost Newcastle 15 million the game has gone |
£15m in 1996 money is today worth just over £31m, due to inflation.
Football value has outperformed inflation, and I am sure that rise cannot continue at the same level. It will probably pop as soon as we need to sell a few players to cover the debts of building two new stands.... |  |
| |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:58 - Aug 25 with 1614 views | FlittonBlue |
After spending nigh on 150m we do get hung up on the minutiae of a cut that will amount to around 2% of our total spend!! | |
| |
| Sell on clause on delap on 19:00 - Aug 25 with 1569 views | pingu67 |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:57 - Aug 25 by urbanpenguin |
£15m in 1996 money is today worth just over £31m, due to inflation.
Football value has outperformed inflation, and I am sure that rise cannot continue at the same level. It will probably pop as soon as we need to sell a few players to cover the debts of building two new stands.... |
Taking inflation into account
£31 mil for Alan shearer or £45 for Liam Delap?
I know which i would rather have | | | |
| Sell on clause on delap on 19:12 - Aug 25 with 1386 views | LegendofthePhoenix |
Does anyone know for certain that we have a sell-on clause at all?
When we signed Delap from MCFC, he had lots of suitors, and his agent insisted on a release clause of £30M. Which was more than we'd paid for him, hence would justify Ashton's claims that "we're very, very well protected".
But (i) there would be a % sell-on to MCFC of any profit we made (and that applies equally to any further profit we get from our sell-on) and
(ii) we believe there were loads of clubs willing to pay the £30M release clause. Which means it was up to Delap to choose which club to join. In other words, ITFC had no say in it - so how could we possibly insert a sell-on clause? We literally had no say in the matter once the release clause was met.
I'd love to be wrong on this, but I just can't see how we could have inserted a sell-on clause, and even if we did, we'd have to pay a % of it to City. [Post edited 25 Aug 19:12]
|  |
| |
| Sell on clause on delap on 19:14 - Aug 25 with 1346 views | burnbudgiesburn |
| Sell on clause on delap on 19:12 - Aug 25 by LegendofthePhoenix |
Does anyone know for certain that we have a sell-on clause at all?
When we signed Delap from MCFC, he had lots of suitors, and his agent insisted on a release clause of £30M. Which was more than we'd paid for him, hence would justify Ashton's claims that "we're very, very well protected".
But (i) there would be a % sell-on to MCFC of any profit we made (and that applies equally to any further profit we get from our sell-on) and
(ii) we believe there were loads of clubs willing to pay the £30M release clause. Which means it was up to Delap to choose which club to join. In other words, ITFC had no say in it - so how could we possibly insert a sell-on clause? We literally had no say in the matter once the release clause was met.
I'd love to be wrong on this, but I just can't see how we could have inserted a sell-on clause, and even if we did, we'd have to pay a % of it to City. [Post edited 25 Aug 19:12]
|
The only way we would have a sell on clause is if it was included in Delaps initial contract
I may be completely making this up but i'm sure Phil has said there is a clause before, but i've never seen it reported as fact anywhere. | | | |
| Sell on clause on delap on 19:22 - Aug 25 with 1259 views | EastTownBlue |
| Sell on clause on delap on 19:12 - Aug 25 by LegendofthePhoenix |
Does anyone know for certain that we have a sell-on clause at all?
When we signed Delap from MCFC, he had lots of suitors, and his agent insisted on a release clause of £30M. Which was more than we'd paid for him, hence would justify Ashton's claims that "we're very, very well protected".
But (i) there would be a % sell-on to MCFC of any profit we made (and that applies equally to any further profit we get from our sell-on) and
(ii) we believe there were loads of clubs willing to pay the £30M release clause. Which means it was up to Delap to choose which club to join. In other words, ITFC had no say in it - so how could we possibly insert a sell-on clause? We literally had no say in the matter once the release clause was met.
I'd love to be wrong on this, but I just can't see how we could have inserted a sell-on clause, and even if we did, we'd have to pay a % of it to City. [Post edited 25 Aug 19:12]
|
Neither club went into that level of detail, TWTD and Sky reported a sell on clause at the time. Yes, I did think about City having a chunk of anything additional we make.
https://www.twtd.co.uk/amp/new | | | |
| Sell on clause on delap on 22:45 - Aug 25 with 900 views | BlueBoots |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:52 - Aug 25 by BloomBlue |
Profit only, so based on rumour, that's £15m profit, 20% sell-on equals £3m. Plus knowing Chelsea's negotiating skills that's probably paid over 6 years, which means £500k per year. |
Fee looking like it will be £50m, so if we have a 20% sell on clause, we would receive £3.2m (20% of the £20m profit, minus 20% of that (£800k) going to Man City) |  |
| |
| Sell on clause on delap on 23:36 - Aug 25 with 732 views | ClareBlue |
| Sell on clause on delap on 18:58 - Aug 25 by FlittonBlue |
After spending nigh on 150m we do get hung up on the minutiae of a cut that will amount to around 2% of our total spend!! |
3 million is not to be sniffed at. It can be put into community development, if we need to find ways to spend it. | | | |
| Sell on clause on delap on 06:58 - Aug 26 with 496 views | WolfieAtTheBack |
| Sell on clause on delap on 23:36 - Aug 25 by ClareBlue |
3 million is not to be sniffed at. It can be put into community development, if we need to find ways to spend it. |
3m will cover the christmas party this year. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
