Loanees shouldn't have 1-11. (n/t) 11:21 - Jul 24 with 1354 views | ITFC_Forever | | |
| | |
Loanees shouldn't have 1-11. (n/t) on 11:22 - Jul 24 with 1350 views | Bluebell | Why? If they are here for a whole season then I don't see the problem. I am assuming our loanees have been signed for a full season! | | | |
Loanees shouldn't have 1-11. (n/t) on 11:23 - Jul 24 with 1338 views | J2BLUE | Ridiculous. | |
| |
Loanees shouldn't have 1-11. (n/t) on 11:23 - Jul 24 with 1338 views | chicoazul | Sort of agree with this. | |
| |
Loanees shouldn't have 1-11. (n/t) on 11:24 - Jul 24 with 1331 views | hoppy | Maybe have an asterisk alongside it if they do, with a disclaimer lower down the shirt stating that they are just on loan? | |
| |
Loanees shouldn't have 1-11. (n/t) on 11:26 - Jul 24 with 1310 views | clive_baker | Do you think they should be invited to the Christmas party? | |
| |
Loanees shouldn't have 1-11. (n/t) on 11:28 - Jul 24 with 1296 views | Bluebell |
Loanees shouldn't have 1-11. (n/t) on 11:26 - Jul 24 by clive_baker | Do you think they should be invited to the Christmas party? |
Definitely not and certainly shouldn't be receiving awards at the end of the season. Tom Lawrence should give his back! | | | |
Loanees shouldn't have 1-11. (n/t) on 13:07 - Jul 24 with 1194 views | itfcjoe | No different to those on a 1 year deal now - especially as we change kit every year! | |
| |
| |