Schoolboy error! on 14:07 - Nov 18 with 952 views | tractorboy1978 | Crazy they get another go of it and Bradford have to travel down to Exeter again. |  | |  |
Schoolboy error! on 14:08 - Nov 18 with 945 views | Fixed_It | Hope they have to pay Bradford's expenses too - that's a long old journey! |  |
|  |
Schoolboy error! on 14:23 - Nov 18 with 886 views | Pendejo | Officials at fault surely? Are LC and FA Cup rules different? The whole reason game codified was to avoid this type of thang |  |
|  |
Schoolboy error! on 14:27 - Nov 18 with 855 views | TractorCam |
Schoolboy error! on 14:07 - Nov 18 by tractorboy1978 | Crazy they get another go of it and Bradford have to travel down to Exeter again. |
Yep, not only do Bradford have to travel down there again, their player who got a red card remains suspended despite the result being void. Amazing how poor planning from Exeter and poor officiating somehow heavily punishes Bradford. I wouldn't bother. |  |
|  |
Schoolboy error! on 14:34 - Nov 18 with 830 views | Guthrum |
Schoolboy error! on 14:27 - Nov 18 by TractorCam | Yep, not only do Bradford have to travel down there again, their player who got a red card remains suspended despite the result being void. Amazing how poor planning from Exeter and poor officiating somehow heavily punishes Bradford. I wouldn't bother. |
I presume that the red card stands as a censure for his poor conduct, irrespective of whether the result is void. |  |
|  |
Schoolboy error! on 17:07 - Nov 18 with 658 views | Pinewoodblue | About the only club who would have excuse for using six subs would be Norwich. |  |
|  |
Schoolboy error! on 17:24 - Nov 18 with 624 views | waveneyblue |
Schoolboy error! on 17:07 - Nov 18 by Pinewoodblue | About the only club who would have excuse for using six subs would be Norwich. |
I think the main thing here is that Exeter were told by the officials that they could use 6 subs - hence they weren't trying to "bend the rules or cheat" Replaying the replay seems the fairest way to be honest . |  | |  |
| |