| Right is that Harry Kane isn’t a penalty under VAR check… 18:00 - Nov 21 with 1056 views | unstableblue |
…. How is totos even close to being a penalty - a ridiculous decision |  |
| |  |
| Right is that Harry Kane isn’t a penalty under VAR check… on 18:04 - Nov 21 with 1027 views | Chrisd |
I suppose the only slight difference is his arm remains by his side, but it was a common sense decision. |  |
| |
| Right is that Harry Kane isn’t a penalty under VAR check… on 18:10 - Nov 21 with 988 views | readtheleaguetable |
Was in the middle of typing the same. The ball struck both of Kane’s arms and the second arm was extended, but he had no time to move either from a shot that hard and that close, and so, rightly, no penalty was given. Toto’s arm was down by his side, he did not move it, and the shot he stopped was even closer and harder. So it was a ridiculous decision and salt in the wound as we lost a game we completely dominated.
Poor Toto cannot catch a break ! |  |
| Qu'est-ce que vous chantez? Nous chantons "Les Bleus, allez!" |
| |
| Right is that Harry Kane isn’t a penalty under VAR check… on 18:11 - Nov 21 with 983 views | chrismakin |
Because spurs are at home........ |  |
| |
| Right is that Harry Kane isn’t a penalty under VAR check… on 18:13 - Nov 21 with 978 views | unstableblue |
| Right is that Harry Kane isn’t a penalty under VAR check… on 18:04 - Nov 21 by Chrisd |
I suppose the only slight difference is his arm remains by his side, but it was a common sense decision. |
Totos was only marginally wider from the body, but he was also turning away and it was struck with great force
And for those not at the game and seeing how we played, it’s distorting their view of the result and game | |
| |
| Right is that Harry Kane isn’t a penalty under VAR check… on 18:31 - Nov 21 with 937 views | Ftnfwest |
Maybe, Leeds certainly the better side today but still lost, although personally I’m still amazed that Bielsa wasn’t sacked in his first season there for not getting them promoted with the resources they had. |  | | |
| Right is that Harry Kane isn’t a penalty under VAR check… on 18:42 - Nov 21 with 898 views | Wickets |
I didn't think it was a penalty yesterday but Kane's bounced off his stomach onto his arm did it not so less of a penalty , if there is such a thing . |  | | |
| Right is that Harry Kane isn’t a penalty under VAR check… on 18:44 - Nov 21 with 901 views | jayessess |
If we're going to get a comedy pen given against us, I'd rather it was in the dying embers of a game we'd already more or less chucked in the bin than at a more crucial moment. |  |
| |
| Right is that Harry Kane isn’t a penalty under VAR check… on 18:47 - Nov 21 with 889 views | unstableblue |
| Right is that Harry Kane isn’t a penalty under VAR check… on 18:44 - Nov 21 by jayessess |
If we're going to get a comedy pen given against us, I'd rather it was in the dying embers of a game we'd already more or less chucked in the bin than at a more crucial moment. |
Good point | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Right is that Harry Kane isn’t a penalty under VAR check… on 19:25 - Nov 21 with 843 views | Chrisd |
| Right is that Harry Kane isn’t a penalty under VAR check… on 18:31 - Nov 21 by Ftnfwest |
Maybe, Leeds certainly the better side today but still lost, although personally I’m still amazed that Bielsa wasn’t sacked in his first season there for not getting them promoted with the resources they had. |
Not in the second half they weren’t. Spurs were a different side after half time. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
