| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute 19:52 - Mar 15 with 1037 views | Keno |
not just today, but for their fans chanting through the Ukraine applause and lest we forget John Terry?
There must be enough grounds surely |  |
| |  |
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 21:19 - Mar 15 with 932 views | MattinLondon |
The trouble being that if teams were docked points every time fans or players acted like bell ends, every club will finish the season on a minus number. |  | | |
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 06:26 - Mar 16 with 826 views | Veggie |
Chelsea have definitely brought the game into distrePutin |  | | |
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 06:50 - Mar 16 with 800 views | ElephantintheRoom |
Athletes caught cheating have their medals taken away. They should do the same with Chelsea as depending on an excess £1.5 billion of blood money is surely a bit more serious than snorting steroids or pretending to be asthmatic. |  |
| |
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 07:25 - Mar 16 with 776 views | Keno |
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 21:19 - Mar 15 by MattinLondon |
The trouble being that if teams were docked points every time fans or players acted like bell ends, every club will finish the season on a minus number. |
It would make the league table fun! | |
| |
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 07:54 - Mar 16 with 729 views | MattinLondon |
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 07:25 - Mar 16 by Keno |
It would make the league table fun! |
It would encourage good sporting behaviour from the players and will also encourage fans to act in a reasonable friendly manner. I am therefore against such measures from being introduced. | | | |
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 08:15 - Mar 16 with 702 views | braveblue |
Simple. No. When we ban people for disagreeing we have lost the battle. | | | |
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 08:19 - Mar 16 with 695 views | Churchman |
That’ll be the John Terry that might have been our manager - shiver…..
Would it not be right for Chelsea to be docked 40 points for their annoying sense of entitlement? |  | | |
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 10:10 - Mar 16 with 631 views | monty_radio |
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 08:15 - Mar 16 by braveblue |
Simple. No. When we ban people for disagreeing we have lost the battle. |
Humane responses should be more complex than simply extending one's enemy list via guilt by association. Some of the righteous sportswriting is in danger of ending with a call for Orwell's two minute hate. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 10:19 - Mar 16 with 615 views | trncbluearmy |
As all their ill gotton silverware was won using corrupt money, every trophy won as Chelski should be removed from the records |  | | |
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 11:26 - Mar 16 with 571 views | monty_radio |
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 10:19 - Mar 16 by trncbluearmy |
As all their ill gotton silverware was won using corrupt money, every trophy won as Chelski should be removed from the records |
And furthermore, if any Russian player wishes to compete at Wimbledon they must all assemble on Centre Court beforehand and sing a specially composed song of denunciation while we all clap for two of Orwell's minutes - that should set the record straight! | |
| |
| Should the FA now dock Chelsea points for bringing the into disrepute on 11:38 - Mar 16 with 550 views | blueasfook |
Is there a more universally hated player in the game than John Terry?
I can't think of one? |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
