| Yes! (n/t) 16:11 - Mar 11 with 908 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Saved by Walton! [Post edited 11 Mar 2023 16:12]
|  |
| |  |
| Yes! (n/t) on 16:12 - Mar 11 with 879 views | Kropotkin123 |
Justice |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| Yes! (n/t) on 16:13 - Mar 11 with 833 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Radio seemed to suggest it was a penalty before it was given. Good save from the advantage too wasn't it? | |
| |
| Yes! (n/t) on 16:23 - Mar 11 with 681 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Yes! (n/t) on 16:13 - Mar 11 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Radio seemed to suggest it was a penalty before it was given. Good save from the advantage too wasn't it? |
The pen was fairly clear although there were a couple of iffy reffing decisions just before then. Not 100% clear though |  |
| |
| Yes! (n/t) on 16:25 - Mar 11 with 666 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Yes! (n/t) on 16:23 - Mar 11 by Swansea_Blue |
The pen was fairly clear although there were a couple of iffy reffing decisions just before then. Not 100% clear though |
Burgess or Davis? | |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| Yes! (n/t) on 16:26 - Mar 11 with 639 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Mathie is very impressed with the ref. Brenner less so. | |
| |
| Yes! (n/t) on 16:28 - Mar 11 with 617 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Yes! (n/t) on 16:25 - Mar 11 by Kropotkin123 |
Burgess or Davis? |
Burgess for pen. Possible foul on Davis leading up to it - not 100% clear though.
How the fk are they avoiding cards for professional fouls now?
Oh, Burgess!!! | |
| |
| Yes! (n/t) on 16:30 - Mar 11 with 591 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Yes! (n/t) on 16:28 - Mar 11 by Swansea_Blue |
Burgess for pen. Possible foul on Davis leading up to it - not 100% clear though.
How the fk are they avoiding cards for professional fouls now?
Oh, Burgess!!! |
A good side wins matches without needing the ref to be even-handed. Now to see it out. | |
| |
| Yes! (n/t) on 17:39 - Mar 11 with 462 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Yes! (n/t) on 16:28 - Mar 11 by Swansea_Blue |
Burgess for pen. Possible foul on Davis leading up to it - not 100% clear though.
How the fk are they avoiding cards for professional fouls now?
Oh, Burgess!!! |
In fairness to me, that challenge and resulting penalty was orders of magnitude softer than the penalties they've spent over two decades complaining about.
Do I have permission to complain about it for a few decades?  | |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Yes! (n/t) on 17:43 - Mar 11 with 438 views | Ryorry |
Hey NthSuffolk, not having a video stream today, I thank you for saving me from becoming a nervous wreck for a few seconds by posting that before the radio stream played the kick being taken, and the comm taking another few secs to tell us the outcome! 👠|  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
