| Very very good goal, but how poor are Weds?! 21:54 - Aug 4 with 1259 views | unstableblue |
That runner has to get marked
But throughout the game just how much possession and ball have Wednesday given away… just criminal
Not good that Saints are getting momentum… but just a bit more quality from Wednesday and they get a draw [Post edited 4 Aug 2023 21:54]
|  |
| |  |
| Very very good goal, but how poor are Weds?! on 21:59 - Aug 4 with 1209 views | Vic |
Lol - you do make me laugh! I love your enthusiasm, but not sure that one game represents getting momentum! |  |
| |
| Very very good goal, but how poor are Weds?! on 22:00 - Aug 4 with 1190 views | unstableblue |
| Very very good goal, but how poor are Weds?! on 21:59 - Aug 4 by Vic |
Lol - you do make me laugh! I love your enthusiasm, but not sure that one game represents getting momentum! |
It’s a fair cop
But a loss in the first game, then doubts about Martins system effectiveness creep around the saints fan base… this win will give them a boost | |
| |
| Very very good goal, but how poor are Weds?! on 22:08 - Aug 4 with 1129 views | NthQldITFC |
Wednesday decided to give Tella, Edozie and Ward-Prowse as much space as they wanted to start off in, which I found a somewhat odd strategy! |  |
| |
| Also, I think Walker Peters was given the keys to the city of sheffield on 22:31 - Aug 4 with 976 views | unstableblue |
| Very very good goal, but how poor are Weds?! on 22:08 - Aug 4 by NthQldITFC |
Wednesday decided to give Tella, Edozie and Ward-Prowse as much space as they wanted to start off in, which I found a somewhat odd strategy! |
.. they did not get near him! | |
| |
| Very very good goal, but how poor are Weds?! on 10:11 - Aug 5 with 632 views | Chocorange |
| Very very good goal, but how poor are Weds?! on 22:08 - Aug 4 by NthQldITFC |
Wednesday decided to give Tella, Edozie and Ward-Prowse as much space as they wanted to start off in, which I found a somewhat odd strategy! |
Seems to me that the Wednesday veterans aren’t fit or able to press , so had to let them pass it around at the back , if they had pressed they would have been even more open.
Needs must if u like.
Thought they were awful, funny thing , over on the owl stalk , they are taking that performance as a big positive , they had 23% possession and were dominated.
They couldn’t get the ball9ff the Saints for most of the 9 minutes added in and when they did , they just gave the ball straight back after one hoof up the pitch. |  | | |
| Very very good goal, but how poor are Weds?! on 10:59 - Aug 5 with 570 views | rodney76 |
| Very very good goal, but how poor are Weds?! on 10:11 - Aug 5 by Chocorange |
Seems to me that the Wednesday veterans aren’t fit or able to press , so had to let them pass it around at the back , if they had pressed they would have been even more open.
Needs must if u like.
Thought they were awful, funny thing , over on the owl stalk , they are taking that performance as a big positive , they had 23% possession and were dominated.
They couldn’t get the ball9ff the Saints for most of the 9 minutes added in and when they did , they just gave the ball straight back after one hoof up the pitch. |
One of the favourites to go up against one of the favourites to be in the relegation zone.
League one enthusiasm versus Premier League class.
Wednesday gave their all and showed effort enough to put in a workmanlike performance.
A draw would have flattered them, but with that support they should survive.
Saints worried me a lot more, especially as Russell Martin has funds to strengthen. Isn't he keen on Nodge's Aarons at about £10m. That would be a solid purchase for the Championship, imo. |  | | |
| Very very good goal, but how poor are Weds?! on 11:14 - Aug 5 with 539 views | chicoazul |
Are Sheff Wednesday the new Cowley brothers 2019 for TWTD to obsess over |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
