| Grammatists - help please: 16:45 - Mar 9 with 1099 views | NthQldITFC |
Cyclist's willy OR Cyclists' willy?
I've been pondering on that whilst pushing it home.
Where's the ownership? |  |
| |  |
| Grammatists - help please: on 16:48 - Mar 9 with 1071 views | BlueBoots |
It's writer's cramp, so I'm guessing it obeys the same rule! |  |
| |
| Grammatists - help please: on 16:51 - Mar 9 with 1041 views | NthQldITFC |
| Grammatists - help please: on 16:48 - Mar 9 by BlueBoots |
It's writer's cramp, so I'm guessing it obeys the same rule! |
I thought as much, ta. Not two things you'd necessarily want at the same time! | |
| |
| Grammatists - help please: on 19:41 - Mar 9 with 945 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
The first one. Unless several cyclists have one willy.
I'd love to know why you were writing about a cyclist's willy, or maybe I wouldn't?! |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Grammatists - help please: on 19:48 - Mar 9 with 923 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Grammatists - help please: on 19:41 - Mar 9 by The_Flashing_Smile |
The first one. Unless several cyclists have one willy.
I'd love to know why you were writing about a cyclist's willy, or maybe I wouldn't?! |
He’s been pushing a willy home by the sounds of it. Now I imagine him to be like this:
 |  |
| |
| Grammatists - help please: on 20:11 - Mar 9 with 898 views | Lord_Lucan |
| Grammatists - help please: on 19:41 - Mar 9 by The_Flashing_Smile |
The first one. Unless several cyclists have one willy.
I'd love to know why you were writing about a cyclist's willy, or maybe I wouldn't?! |
Yes.
You form the possessive by adding an apostrophe and an "s" |  |
| |
| Grammatists - help please: on 20:24 - Mar 9 with 859 views | NthQldITFC |
| Grammatists - help please: on 19:41 - Mar 9 by The_Flashing_Smile |
The first one. Unless several cyclists have one willy.
I'd love to know why you were writing about a cyclist's willy, or maybe I wouldn't?! |
Well, I suppose I was thinking that the condition is one which belongs to cyclists in the plural, therefore the apostrophe follows the plural form, and the willy is kind of nominal rather than an instance.
Anyway, it was pretty cold on the way home, so it wasn't really a big issue. | |
| |
| Grammatists - help please: on 21:22 - Mar 9 with 772 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Grammatists - help please: on 20:24 - Mar 9 by NthQldITFC |
Well, I suppose I was thinking that the condition is one which belongs to cyclists in the plural, therefore the apostrophe follows the plural form, and the willy is kind of nominal rather than an instance.
Anyway, it was pretty cold on the way home, so it wasn't really a big issue. |
Ah! Well if it's a condition then yes, cyclists' willy is correct.
I hope you sleep comfortably! | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Grammatists - help please: on 08:05 - Mar 10 with 614 views | nodge_blue |
| Grammatists - help please: on 21:22 - Mar 9 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Ah! Well if it's a condition then yes, cyclists' willy is correct.
I hope you sleep comfortably! |
AI said:
The correct placement of the apostrophe depends on whether you're referring to one cyclist or multiple cyclists:
One cyclist: "Cyclist's willy" (possessive singular)
Multiple cyclists: "Cyclists' willies" (possessive plural) |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Grammatists - help please: on 08:14 - Mar 10 with 596 views | solemio |
This is nothing to do with grammar. It is punctuation. |  | | |
| Grammatists - help please: on 08:19 - Mar 10 with 589 views | NthQldITFC |
| Grammatists - help please: on 08:14 - Mar 10 by solemio |
This is nothing to do with grammar. It is punctuation. |
Fair point. I'll tell her she can stop worrying about my willy and get on with her knitting then. | |
| |
| Grammatists - help please: on 08:46 - Mar 10 with 566 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Grammatists - help please: on 08:05 - Mar 10 by nodge_blue |
AI said:
The correct placement of the apostrophe depends on whether you're referring to one cyclist or multiple cyclists:
One cyclist: "Cyclist's willy" (possessive singular)
Multiple cyclists: "Cyclists' willies" (possessive plural) |
This is what I said! | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Grammatists - help please: on 08:50 - Mar 10 with 544 views | NthQldITFC |
| Grammatists - help please: on 08:05 - Mar 10 by nodge_blue |
AI said:
The correct placement of the apostrophe depends on whether you're referring to one cyclist or multiple cyclists:
One cyclist: "Cyclist's willy" (possessive singular)
Multiple cyclists: "Cyclists' willies" (possessive plural) |
Yeah well that's the normal arrangement of course, but when it's a sort of semi-recognised (actually, perhaps 'semi' is not the most apt prefix here) condition then are we referring to the group who tend to suffer from it, or are we referring to the individual who is suffering from it?
Wears Suzi Dent when you knead her? (I like that!) [Post edited 10 Mar 8:51]
| |
| |
| Grammatists - help please: on 08:51 - Mar 10 with 542 views | Keno |
Well I am shocked that with all this mention of Willys in the thread Phil has pulled it yet |  |
| |
| Grammatists - help please: on 08:58 - Mar 10 with 527 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Grammatists - help please: on 08:50 - Mar 10 by NthQldITFC |
Yeah well that's the normal arrangement of course, but when it's a sort of semi-recognised (actually, perhaps 'semi' is not the most apt prefix here) condition then are we referring to the group who tend to suffer from it, or are we referring to the individual who is suffering from it?
Wears Suzi Dent when you knead her? (I like that!) [Post edited 10 Mar 8:51]
|
You're the one writing about it, you tell us! | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Grammatists - help please: on 08:59 - Mar 10 with 526 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Grammatists - help please: on 08:51 - Mar 10 by Keno |
Well I am shocked that with all this mention of Willys in the thread Phil has pulled it yet |
Balls. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Grammatists - help please: on 09:02 - Mar 10 with 522 views | nodge_blue |
| Grammatists - help please: on 08:50 - Mar 10 by NthQldITFC |
Yeah well that's the normal arrangement of course, but when it's a sort of semi-recognised (actually, perhaps 'semi' is not the most apt prefix here) condition then are we referring to the group who tend to suffer from it, or are we referring to the individual who is suffering from it?
Wears Suzi Dent when you knead her? (I like that!) [Post edited 10 Mar 8:51]
|
If you were generally talking about the condition then it is in the singular as you only refer to one Willy and not willies. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
