Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers 17:54 - Sep 1 with 768 views | Chris_ITFC | McKenna obviously would’ve wanted Chaplin to stay. We haven’t just farmed him out, it’s clearly a move he would’ve wanted. Trouble is, when you’ve told Morsy, Broadhead, Woolfenden that they’ve basically ‘earned the right’ to decide their future, you can hardly deny Chaplin the same without him being seriously miffed. HUGE gamble. HUGE void of leadership / structure to fill in this squad as a result. |  |
| |  |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 18:02 - Sep 1 with 650 views | Swansea_Blue | Yeah, a huge gamble. A whole new spine to the team since last time and several characters/leaders gone. KM and the senior players have really got their work cut out to turn us back into a team tactically and a strong unit mentally. We’re certainly lacking both, although rescuing a point a couple of times shows some spirit. It’s very different to winning games at the end, which was such a big part of 23/24 season. |  |
|  |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 18:10 - Sep 1 with 591 views | SuffolkPunchFC | Why is is obvious that McKenna would have wanted Chaplin to stay? I love Chaplin - he epitomises the last 3 years. He's a Duracell Bunny too - and does some great things, plus brings some energy to the pitch. He's also been less effective recently - maybe just Old Father Time. Similar to Morsy - I thought he'd stay this season, but get fewer and fewer minutes as the season progressed, as the changing of the guard played out. Chaplin was similar for me - it's just played out quicker than I thought. |  | |  |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 18:18 - Sep 1 with 544 views | Jon_456 |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 18:10 - Sep 1 by SuffolkPunchFC | Why is is obvious that McKenna would have wanted Chaplin to stay? I love Chaplin - he epitomises the last 3 years. He's a Duracell Bunny too - and does some great things, plus brings some energy to the pitch. He's also been less effective recently - maybe just Old Father Time. Similar to Morsy - I thought he'd stay this season, but get fewer and fewer minutes as the season progressed, as the changing of the guard played out. Chaplin was similar for me - it's just played out quicker than I thought. |
Footballs a funny game. Less effective recently? Thought Chaplin had done more in his 70mins Saturday than Szmodics had done all season. |  | |  |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 18:21 - Sep 1 with 520 views | Chris_ITFC |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 18:10 - Sep 1 by SuffolkPunchFC | Why is is obvious that McKenna would have wanted Chaplin to stay? I love Chaplin - he epitomises the last 3 years. He's a Duracell Bunny too - and does some great things, plus brings some energy to the pitch. He's also been less effective recently - maybe just Old Father Time. Similar to Morsy - I thought he'd stay this season, but get fewer and fewer minutes as the season progressed, as the changing of the guard played out. Chaplin was similar for me - it's just played out quicker than I thought. |
I’m not saying he’s a starter, but the squad is 100% weaker without him. McKenna intimated he didn’t want others to leave this summer, and if he didn’t want Chaplin around, it wouldn’t have taken until today - nor would he have been the one wheeled out doing interviews about how he’ll fill the leadership void left by Morsy. [Post edited 1 Sep 22:10]
|  |
|  |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 22:07 - Sep 1 with 352 views | Chris_ITFC |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 18:10 - Sep 1 by SuffolkPunchFC | Why is is obvious that McKenna would have wanted Chaplin to stay? I love Chaplin - he epitomises the last 3 years. He's a Duracell Bunny too - and does some great things, plus brings some energy to the pitch. He's also been less effective recently - maybe just Old Father Time. Similar to Morsy - I thought he'd stay this season, but get fewer and fewer minutes as the season progressed, as the changing of the guard played out. Chaplin was similar for me - it's just played out quicker than I thought. |
Confirmed by Phil… not one we planned / wanted, but as per the OP, allowed the player to go… “It’s understood Chaplin was keen to play week in, week out, something which wasn’t guaranteed at Town in the campaign ahead, and when the possibility of a move back to Pompey emerged, the Worthing-born attacker was interested in pursuing it and the club helped facilitate the loan switch. Had it been any other side, the Blues may not have given the greenlight to the move.” |  |
|  |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 22:13 - Sep 1 with 273 views | FrimleyBlue |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 22:07 - Sep 1 by Chris_ITFC | Confirmed by Phil… not one we planned / wanted, but as per the OP, allowed the player to go… “It’s understood Chaplin was keen to play week in, week out, something which wasn’t guaranteed at Town in the campaign ahead, and when the possibility of a move back to Pompey emerged, the Worthing-born attacker was interested in pursuing it and the club helped facilitate the loan switch. Had it been any other side, the Blues may not have given the greenlight to the move.” |
It's nice in one aspect that the club are quite human with things. But as a club isn't it also a dangerous precedent too.. |  |
|  |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 22:15 - Sep 1 with 255 views | hunty21 | And yet players like hackney guehi Sargent stay sometimes a compromise in needed but we are weak on that department |  | |  |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 22:17 - Sep 1 with 222 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 18:18 - Sep 1 by Jon_456 | Footballs a funny game. Less effective recently? Thought Chaplin had done more in his 70mins Saturday than Szmodics had done all season. |
I’m not talking about one game - it’s based on his impact when he’s played over the year. Unlike some comments we see on the forum, I wouldn’t make an assessment based on 1 appearance. Yes, there have been times he’s emulated 2023/24, but imo he’s not the impact player he was 2 years ago. Can’t fault his energy, but that doesn’t ensure an end product. |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 22:23 - Sep 1 with 185 views | Chris_ITFC |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 22:13 - Sep 1 by FrimleyBlue | It's nice in one aspect that the club are quite human with things. But as a club isn't it also a dangerous precedent too.. |
£4m for Woolfy and £0 for Morsy seems massively underselling them too, plus potential rivals strengthened in Blades, Cov and Wrexham (as much as we might not like to say it). It’s not ideal having unhappy players, but we’ve been particularly generous, to our own detriment I’d say. |  |
|  |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 22:26 - Sep 1 with 161 views | Churchman |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 22:13 - Sep 1 by FrimleyBlue | It's nice in one aspect that the club are quite human with things. But as a club isn't it also a dangerous precedent too.. |
No. What is right is right. If Morsy wanted that uber payday at 34 and we helped him it’s right. Same for Chaplin with his hometown club. Brilliant bloke and a terrific player but if he wants to be more than a squad player we should let him go with our blessing, sadly. His character was just the best. Woolfy? Well the club put themselves in a corner by trying to upgrade on him. Did they succeed? Not really for me but that’s not the point. We are where we are and he’s been rightly let go. AAH? I think he has a bit about him. Luton is a good club and I hope he does well. If he does a £1m player will bring in £3m. £2m profit that a certain poster called sht and others who would have willingly driven him anywhere for nothing or/and abused him in pre season at Colchester with malicious gusto. Treating people right is never a dangerous precedent FB. It’s the opposite in my view. [Post edited 1 Sep 22:41]
|  | |  |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 22:27 - Sep 1 with 159 views | Bluesky |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 18:18 - Sep 1 by Jon_456 | Footballs a funny game. Less effective recently? Thought Chaplin had done more in his 70mins Saturday than Szmodics had done all season. |
Not fair to Szmodics - heputs in a full shift everytime he steps on the pitch. |  | |  |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 22:32 - Sep 1 with 127 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
Loyalty & Player Driven Transfers on 22:07 - Sep 1 by Chris_ITFC | Confirmed by Phil… not one we planned / wanted, but as per the OP, allowed the player to go… “It’s understood Chaplin was keen to play week in, week out, something which wasn’t guaranteed at Town in the campaign ahead, and when the possibility of a move back to Pompey emerged, the Worthing-born attacker was interested in pursuing it and the club helped facilitate the loan switch. Had it been any other side, the Blues may not have given the greenlight to the move.” |
It does pretty much also confirm what I suggested though - CC, if he stayed, would get declining minutes, as the squad is transitioning, and he wanted/needed something different. I’m sad to see Chapman move, and maybe we’ll see him play for us again, but it’s an inevitable result of the evolution. |  | |  |
| |