| The FA taking their time to fine us… on 17:52 - Sep 8 with 3230 views | EastTownBlue |
Good point given that Stoke and West Brom have been fined £5,000 for a more recent incident. That is unless the charge has been contested by one of the clubs which would delay proceedings a bit, although given the fairly low fines involved that probably isn't worth it. |  | |  |
| The FA taking their time to fine us… on 19:37 - Sep 8 with 2932 views | ITFC_Forever |
Too busy trying to work out how to not punish Man City. |  |
| |
| The FA taking their time to fine us… on 14:03 - Sep 19 with 1346 views | SitfcB |
Still nothing… |  |
| |
| The FA taking their time to fine us… on 14:22 - Sep 19 with 1234 views | _clive_baker_ |
"It’s alleged that both clubs failed to ensure their players didn’t behave in an improper and/or provocative way around the 95th minute".
I can't even understand that sentence. |  | | |
| The FA taking their time to fine us… on 16:07 - Sep 19 with 993 views | Pinewoodblue |
| The FA taking their time to fine us… on 14:22 - Sep 19 by _clive_baker_ |
"It’s alleged that both clubs failed to ensure their players didn’t behave in an improper and/or provocative way around the 95th minute".
I can't even understand that sentence. |
Think they mean the exact opposite |  |
| |
| The FA taking their time to fine us… on 16:45 - Sep 19 with 868 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
| The FA taking their time to fine us… on 14:22 - Sep 19 by _clive_baker_ |
"It’s alleged that both clubs failed to ensure their players didn’t behave in an improper and/or provocative way around the 95th minute".
I can't even understand that sentence. |
It's the normal, but horrible, double negative they use to ensure it matches the rule as it's written.
The rule states that clubs must 'ensure their players don't act improperly/provocatively'.
The charge is that we failed.
Horrible grammar, but correct in what they are trying to say. | | | |
| The FA taking their time to fine us… on 22:59 - Sep 19 with 362 views | Facefacts |
So long ago but I just can't remember what we did that was wrong. Only saw replays but Chappers booting the ball into the crowd, do me a favour, that's not failing to control your players. Seen it before, a lot, nothing in it, lots of players do it. It was all started by the B. City players and the odd 'fan'.. Uppity that the three points became just one point. Sorry if we've been through all this before, but why can't you celebrate when you score a goal? Only the uppity BC fans and players made a thing of it. If I was watching it all back I'd say we have no case to answer. Taking a long time if they're scraping the barrel to find video evidence of our players being out of control. Our fine, £5, theirs £100. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| The FA taking their time to fine us… on 23:27 - Sep 19 with 297 views | TractorWood |
| The FA taking their time to fine us… on 22:59 - Sep 19 by Facefacts |
So long ago but I just can't remember what we did that was wrong. Only saw replays but Chappers booting the ball into the crowd, do me a favour, that's not failing to control your players. Seen it before, a lot, nothing in it, lots of players do it. It was all started by the B. City players and the odd 'fan'.. Uppity that the three points became just one point. Sorry if we've been through all this before, but why can't you celebrate when you score a goal? Only the uppity BC fans and players made a thing of it. If I was watching it all back I'd say we have no case to answer. Taking a long time if they're scraping the barrel to find video evidence of our players being out of control. Our fine, £5, theirs £100. |
Chaplin was in the wrong but it was contextually minor in the wider reaction.
Brum is always feral. It's just like that. |  |
| |
| The FA taking their time to fine us… on 23:31 - Sep 19 with 286 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| The FA taking their time to fine us… on 16:45 - Sep 19 by SuffolkPunchFC |
It's the normal, but horrible, double negative they use to ensure it matches the rule as it's written.
The rule states that clubs must 'ensure their players don't act improperly/provocatively'.
The charge is that we failed.
Horrible grammar, but correct in what they are trying to say. |
The rule itself is a double negative and should read that it is the club’s responsibility to ensure their players act in a proper manner towards match officials at all times. The charge is now a triple negative thanks to the rule already being a double one. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
