| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) 18:22 - Oct 25 with 1705 views | MaySixth |
|  |
| |  |
| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) on 18:28 - Oct 25 with 1678 views | BloomBlue |
To be fair Charlton weren't any better. The difference today was our defence tackled, headed the ball, and actually marked WBA players. |  | | |
| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) on 19:50 - Oct 25 with 1499 views | WestSussexBlue |
And yet we only won 1-0 with a late goal? Either we’re also not great or they deserve a little more credit, which is it? |  | | |
| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) on 19:52 - Oct 25 with 1484 views | DavoIPB |
| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) on 19:50 - Oct 25 by WestSussexBlue |
And yet we only won 1-0 with a late goal? Either we’re also not great or they deserve a little more credit, which is it? |
We are also very poor | | | |
| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) on 20:00 - Oct 25 with 1438 views | ITFCSG |
| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) on 19:52 - Oct 25 by DavoIPB |
We are also very poor |
Agree, a neutral would probably have fallen asleep by HT | | | |
| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) on 20:34 - Oct 25 with 1306 views | BouncebackIpswich |
Don't agree with this, they were solid and hard to break down, it was a classic away performance coming for a point which they would have achieved if it wasn't for a huge error at the back |  |
| |
| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) on 20:40 - Oct 25 with 1265 views | blueislander |
Hyperbole must be your specialist subject | | | |
| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) on 20:51 - Oct 25 with 1202 views | Kieran_Knows |
They were industrial, and that’s being kind to them. |  |
| |
| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) on 21:02 - Oct 25 with 1106 views | Esseeja |
I think they were defensively fine until we scored. We should have gone on to score at least 3 more of those chances imo.
We were still just huffing and puffing as much as we were against Charlton, but with less chances to score in the first half.
When it was time to attack, I think they were actually worse than Sheffield United were until we scored against them. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) on 21:13 - Oct 25 with 1044 views | RegencyBlue |
They came for a point and almost got it! |  | | |
| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) on 21:45 - Oct 25 with 908 views | jas0999 |
Two. Mid table sides. | | | |
| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) on 22:44 - Oct 25 with 739 views | Mat |
| WBA horrifically bad (n/t) on 18:28 - Oct 25 by BloomBlue |
To be fair Charlton weren't any better. The difference today was our defence tackled, headed the ball, and actually marked WBA players. |
Yep thought they were better than Charlton…. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
