Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Yesterdays Ref. 09:27 - Mar 8 with 758 viewsMaccaisgod

Firstly the free kick that led t the Leicester goal was never a free kick in a million years, the bloke throughout the game was a whistle happy game spoiler.

However if you look at Alex Griffins vlog on youtube, he has a perfect piece of footage of the last minute penalty incident and i think Kipre throws himself down as the defender just holds his ground.

Shoot me down as im sure you will but i genuinely think he dived, but maybe he didnt....

[Post edited 8 Mar 9:32]
-2
Yesterdays Ref. on 09:28 - Mar 8 with 732 viewsBseaBlue

Its a foul all day long. Thr bloke just runs straight across him!
0
Yesterdays Ref. on 09:29 - Mar 8 with 709 viewsDubtractor

Even Rowett conceded it should have been a penalty. It was as nailed on as it gets.

I was born underwater, I dried out in the sun. I started humping volcanoes baby, when I was too young.
Poll: If there was an election today, who would get your vote?

2
Yesterdays Ref. on 09:31 - Mar 8 with 686 viewsmrfixit426

Good grief, that's some take. It's right there in front of your eyes. If Kipre had continued on his trajectory, the ball would have landed right on his head.
0
Yesterdays Ref. on 09:33 - Mar 8 with 659 viewsMaccaisgod

Yesterdays Ref. on 09:31 - Mar 8 by mrfixit426

Good grief, that's some take. It's right there in front of your eyes. If Kipre had continued on his trajectory, the ball would have landed right on his head.


Yes the more i watch it the more i think he did stick his leg across his run.
1
Yesterdays Ref. on 09:38 - Mar 8 with 623 viewsbrogansnose

The free kick that led to the Leicester goal was a foul. There was no need for Furlong to put two hands on the player when both he and Matusiwa had him in a position where he wasn't that dangerous and had a lot of work to do to make something happen.
0
Yesterdays Ref. on 09:39 - Mar 8 with 607 viewsLeoMuff

Yesterdays Ref. on 09:33 - Mar 8 by Maccaisgod

Yes the more i watch it the more i think he did stick his leg across his run.


It’s not just that in isolation though, even though it shouldn’t be penalty decisions are cumulative if you have a few tight ones then you get the benefit of the doubt for others.

The fact that Leif - I’m sure VAR would give, Mehetmi I think would also be given and Azon - don’t think this was went before makes it the more comical.

It’s also not a good look to say you didn’t see it and be recorded doing the opposite .

Should be sanctioned really, dreadful officiating

The only Muff in Town.
Poll: Lamberts rotational policy has left us....

0
Yesterdays Ref. on 09:48 - Mar 8 with 527 viewsRadioOrwell

Yesterdays Ref. on 09:33 - Mar 8 by Maccaisgod

Yes the more i watch it the more i think he did stick his leg across his run.


You mean you needed several looks at it to work that out ?
0
Yesterdays Ref. on 09:50 - Mar 8 with 517 viewsDJR

Yesterdays Ref. on 09:38 - Mar 8 by brogansnose

The free kick that led to the Leicester goal was a foul. There was no need for Furlong to put two hands on the player when both he and Matusiwa had him in a position where he wasn't that dangerous and had a lot of work to do to make something happen.


I saw that from side-on in the upper north and there was a clear push on the back by Furlong which the ref had to give. As you suggest it was very stupid.
[Post edited 8 Mar 9:52]
0
Login to get fewer ads

Yesterdays Ref. on 09:52 - Mar 8 with 503 viewsKieran_Knows

It’s as clear as foul as you’ll ever see. If that’s anywhere else on the pitch it’s a foul.

Poll: We’ve got super KM, he knows exactly what we need. Woolfie at the back…

0
Yesterdays Ref. on 09:54 - Mar 8 with 486 viewsMaccaisgod

Yesterdays Ref. on 09:48 - Mar 8 by RadioOrwell

You mean you needed several looks at it to work that out ?


I think he didn't try his hardest to stay upright.
0
Yesterdays Ref. on 10:44 - Mar 8 with 371 viewsnorfsufblue

Yesterdays Ref. on 09:29 - Mar 8 by Dubtractor

Even Rowett conceded it should have been a penalty. It was as nailed on as it gets.


"erm i wasn't looking at it " is almost a confession that its a foul as he could easily have called it a "coming together " ...
0
Yesterdays Ref. on 10:47 - Mar 8 with 359 viewsBanksterDebtSlave

Yesterdays Ref. on 09:38 - Mar 8 by brogansnose

The free kick that led to the Leicester goal was a foul. There was no need for Furlong to put two hands on the player when both he and Matusiwa had him in a position where he wasn't that dangerous and had a lot of work to do to make something happen.


Agreed it was a definite foul, 2 handed shove in the back if I remember correctly.
[Post edited 8 Mar 10:48]

"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
Poll: Do you wipe after having a piss?

0
Yesterdays Ref. on 10:59 - Mar 8 with 324 viewsMattinLondon

It was a definite penalty and considering the ref tried to claim that he didn’t see it confirms that he knew he made a complete balls-up. If he didn’t think that it was a pen, simply say that.

But, if we had played like how we did for the final thirty mins for all of the match, we would’ve won. Yes, the referee made a huge blunder but the first half lacked intensity and controlled aggression. Plus, the lack of a very good Championship striker also cost us three points again.
0
Yesterdays Ref. on 11:08 - Mar 8 with 302 viewsTractorJack

Watching it live it looked like he clumsily bundled him over - still a foul. Seeing the reply it's worse because he also deliberately puts his leg across him.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026