| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) 15:49 - Mar 13 with 725 views | Bluefish |
|  |
| |  |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 15:50 - Mar 13 with 709 views | Dubtractor |
Edwards is having a really frustrating game. Has got himself into good positions a lot, but delivery has been pretty ropey. |  |
| |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 15:54 - Mar 13 with 666 views | Bluefish |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 15:50 - Mar 13 by Dubtractor |
Edwards is having a really frustrating game. Has got himself into good positions a lot, but delivery has been pretty ropey. |
Have you ever commented on him having a good game? People comment about him every game not having a good game but don't seem to join the dots | |
| |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 15:55 - Mar 13 with 656 views | longtimefan |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 15:50 - Mar 13 by Dubtractor |
Edwards is having a really frustrating game. Has got himself into good positions a lot, but delivery has been pretty ropey. |
To be replaced by someone who was completely innocuous in the previous game?  |  | | |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 15:56 - Mar 13 with 636 views | PJH |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 15:55 - Mar 13 by longtimefan |
To be replaced by someone who was completely innocuous in the previous game? |
Like for like then. |  | | |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 16:00 - Mar 13 with 597 views | longtimefan |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 15:56 - Mar 13 by PJH |
Like for like then. |
We’ve had far more threat down the right than the left. | | | |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 16:01 - Mar 13 with 577 views | chrismakin |
Edwards on left
Judge as 10
Bennetts on for parrot and put on right |  |
| |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 16:02 - Mar 13 with 570 views | Radlett_blue |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 16:01 - Mar 13 by chrismakin |
Edwards on left
Judge as 10
Bennetts on for parrot and put on right |
And Skuse to come on with 20 minutes left if we're still ahead? |  |
| |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 16:03 - Mar 13 with 558 views | clive_baker |
With Dozzell & Bishop in the middle I would be very nervous about Lankester on for Edwards. Need to manage this game out effectively, and while Edwards is no world beater he’s more street wise. Wouldn’t be against seeing Skuse for 20 minutes and Bishop out wide. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 16:05 - Mar 13 with 529 views | hoppy |
Are you not that keen on Edwards? |  |
| |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 16:06 - Mar 13 with 522 views | Bluefish |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 16:05 - Mar 13 by hoppy |
Are you not that keen on Edwards? |
He has just been having a bad spell......for 3 seasons | |
| |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 16:27 - Mar 13 with 475 views | Enigma_Blue |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 16:06 - Mar 13 by Bluefish |
He has just been having a bad spell......for 3 seasons |
Yes and in those 3 seasons he has arguably still contributed more than Judge, Bishop Dozzell, Nolan & Lankester. Doesn't say much for those I have mentioned. [Post edited 13 Mar 2021 16:34]
| | | |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 16:43 - Mar 13 with 426 views | Bluefish |
| Lankester for Edwards please (n/t) on 16:27 - Mar 13 by Enigma_Blue |
Yes and in those 3 seasons he has arguably still contributed more than Judge, Bishop Dozzell, Nolan & Lankester. Doesn't say much for those I have mentioned. [Post edited 13 Mar 2021 16:34]
|
When you say arguably....is that like arguably the earth is flat? Or arguably the tories aren't corrupt liars? | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
