| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 17:35 - Nov 3 with 693 views | footers |
'At a reasonable distance' - and in this case, presumably being less than a foot away from a 95-year-old bloke?
It's clear why he wasn't wearing one. Tosser. |  |
|  |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 17:39 - Nov 3 with 674 views | BrianTablet |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 17:35 - Nov 3 by footers |
'At a reasonable distance' - and in this case, presumably being less than a foot away from a 95-year-old bloke?
It's clear why he wasn't wearing one. Tosser. |
If you're the PM and you're explaining things as badly as that, you're more than losing.
Floundering buffoon. |  |
| |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 17:45 - Nov 3 with 653 views | factual_blue |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 17:35 - Nov 3 by footers |
'At a reasonable distance' - and in this case, presumably being less than a foot away from a 95-year-old bloke?
It's clear why he wasn't wearing one. Tosser. |
Is the answer 'he wasn't wearing one because his nanny forgot'?
It's a good job he doesn't have regular dealings with any other 95 year-olds.
Oh..... |  |
| |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 17:52 - Nov 3 with 641 views | footers |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 17:45 - Nov 3 by factual_blue |
Is the answer 'he wasn't wearing one because his nanny forgot'?
It's a good job he doesn't have regular dealings with any other 95 year-olds.
Oh..... |
I was more thinking he wants to signal to his moronic fan club that doing so was OK 'cos boris didn't!'
JRM's the one whose nanny would forget.
And arf! [Post edited 3 Nov 2021 17:56]
| |
| |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 18:04 - Nov 3 with 615 views | XYZ |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 17:45 - Nov 3 by factual_blue |
Is the answer 'he wasn't wearing one because his nanny forgot'?
It's a good job he doesn't have regular dealings with any other 95 year-olds.
Oh..... |
She keeps chucking sickies to avoid seeing him; admirable really. |  | | |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 18:10 - Nov 3 with 592 views | XYZ |
Save me the trouble of soiling myself by clicking on that link. Is that nanny? I was referring to Brenda. | | | |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 18:12 - Nov 3 with 583 views | factual_blue |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 17:39 - Nov 3 by BrianTablet |
If you're the PM and you're explaining things as badly as that, you're more than losing.
Floundering buffoon. |
Always,always think of boris as a public school fourth-former. He has two approaches: the smirky face when he thinks he's come up with a fantastic wheeze about why he hasn't done his Latin prep; and the shifty, waffling persona on display here. That's when he's said he has done his Latin prep but is caught out in his lying. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 18:14 - Nov 3 with 565 views | factual_blue |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 18:10 - Nov 3 by XYZ |
Save me the trouble of soiling myself by clicking on that link. Is that nanny? I was referring to Brenda. |
That's nanny. Or possibly Rosa Krebb. | |
| |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 18:19 - Nov 3 with 546 views | XYZ |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 18:14 - Nov 3 by factual_blue |
That's nanny. Or possibly Rosa Krebb. |
Blimey. Imagine her being the last thing you saw before falling asleep. | | | |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 18:49 - Nov 3 with 497 views | factual_blue |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 18:19 - Nov 3 by XYZ |
Blimey. Imagine her being the last thing you saw before falling asleep. |
Oooooh.....yes please! | |
| |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 18:55 - Nov 3 with 486 views | BrianTablet |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 18:12 - Nov 3 by factual_blue |
Always,always think of boris as a public school fourth-former. He has two approaches: the smirky face when he thinks he's come up with a fantastic wheeze about why he hasn't done his Latin prep; and the shifty, waffling persona on display here. That's when he's said he has done his Latin prep but is caught out in his lying. |
The face when Sir catches him copying Jacob Reeks-Smug's essay on why the Victorian Industrialists were the pinnacle of British civilisation? | |
| |
| If you're explaining, you're losing. on 19:07 - Nov 3 with 454 views | BlueBadger |
Yes, but Angela Rayner. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
