Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Time for Warnock;) (n/t) 21:47 - Nov 23 with 658 viewschrismakin


Never be afraid to share your thoughts.
Poll: As TWTD polls influence Ashton.. what should he have for breakfast tomorrow?
Blog: We Need to Go Back to the Past to Go Forwards

-1
Time for Warnock;) (n/t) on 21:48 - Nov 23 with 642 viewsSwansea_Blue

We haven't got enough cloggers and hoofers for Warnock.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0
Time for Warnock;) (n/t) on 21:48 - Nov 23 with 642 viewsJ2BLUE

Good call.. What are we waiting for?

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
Time for Warnock;) (n/t) on 21:59 - Nov 23 with 533 viewsWicklowBlue

Not sure that is the answer either, even though really struggling to be positive tonight.

Sure why not Big Sam, or Bruce??? Something just isn't right once again.

To be "mildly" backing PC, how many times have we put out a consistent side for a run of games? Aluko, Burns, Coulson et all injured?

On the flip side, all season we've struggled in CM, lack of changes when the game has been ebbing away from us. Lack of belief, confidence seems to be permating through the squad. Do we know what our game plan is?

Tbh this seems all a bit akin to Ole and the Man U situation. Assembled a strong squad in L1 but we can't seem to get a coherent team together. The Oldham games should have been alarm bells.

Background coaching staff, Reid, injuries etc etc However whatever Cook wants is not getting through to the team.

Something needs to change fast, and...well I'll sleep on it before I do the PC out piece.
0
Time for Warnock;) (n/t) on 23:12 - Nov 23 with 417 viewsbrazil1981

🤦🏼‍♂️ ffs
0
Time for Warnock;) (n/t) on 23:18 - Nov 23 with 379 viewsgazzer1999

Remind me what the stupid question was again.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024