| scum? on 15:07 - Nov 30 with 1045 views | footers |
Unfortunately, that's what decades of anti-migrant, anti-refugee rhetoric does to people, when we should be investing in new homes, the NHS and infrastructure. But it's much easier to blame the weak and the helpless for our woes. No small irony that the story is in the Mail. |  |
|  |
| scum? on 15:10 - Nov 30 with 1034 views | giant_stow |
| scum? on 15:07 - Nov 30 by footers |
Unfortunately, that's what decades of anti-migrant, anti-refugee rhetoric does to people, when we should be investing in new homes, the NHS and infrastructure. But it's much easier to blame the weak and the helpless for our woes. No small irony that the story is in the Mail. |
Yeah all adds up and yes to the last line too. |  |
| |
| scum? on 15:33 - Nov 30 with 976 views | J2BLUE |
That's a very short video. Was he being a bit of a tw@t for a very short time or did he actually block them for a long period of time? If it's the former he should be on some sort of charge. If it's the latter he should be on some sort of very serious charge. |  |
| |
| scum? on 15:48 - Nov 30 with 935 views | footers |
| scum? on 15:33 - Nov 30 by J2BLUE |
That's a very short video. Was he being a bit of a tw@t for a very short time or did he actually block them for a long period of time? If it's the former he should be on some sort of charge. If it's the latter he should be on some sort of very serious charge. |
Interfering with the volunteers of the RNLI is the action of a very special type of c-unit. Especially as a fisherman himself, he should know better than that. Hope they can charge him with something. | |
| |
| scum? on 15:53 - Nov 30 with 917 views | hoppy |
It doesn't mention anywhere in the article that he supports Norwich, but that aside, yes, I agree. |  |
| |
| scum? on 17:21 - Nov 30 with 785 views | The_Major |
I would say definitely. |  | | |
| scum? on 21:46 - Nov 30 with 652 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| scum? on 15:33 - Nov 30 by J2BLUE |
That's a very short video. Was he being a bit of a tw@t for a very short time or did he actually block them for a long period of time? If it's the former he should be on some sort of charge. If it's the latter he should be on some sort of very serious charge. |
Just read about this.
It is a criminal offence to obstruct the emergency services isn't it?
I hope he gets a custodial sentence or at least a very hefty fine.
"We are full"?! Needs some educating.
"That's why we stopped our donations" hopefully many more decent people are giving far more than they ever gave. I doubt they will turn down the help of the lifeboat if they need it. It would be ironic if it was called out for them and someone obstructing it prevented their rescue (not wishing it at all but simply pointing out the irony). |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
