Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Gotta love science 12:12 - Feb 9 with 866 viewshomer_123

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-60312633

Yes, it's small scale but the potential is HUGE!

Ade Akinbiyi couldn't hit a cows arse with a banjo...
Poll: As things stand, how confident are you we will get promoted this season?

1
Gotta love science on 12:19 - Feb 9 with 824 viewsblueasfook

This process requires huge amounts of heat though. (100 million degrees to be exact).

The true holy grail of cheap abundant energy is cold fusion - which we are still some way off achieving.

"A+++++", "Great Comms, would recommend", "Thank you, the 12 inch black mamba is just perfect" - Ebay.
Poll: Should Frimmers be allowed back?

0
Gotta love science on 12:21 - Feb 9 with 810 viewsKeno

does this mean we can do Warp Drive yet?

Poll: At which of our last 10 games will be confirm EPL survival?
Blog: [Blog] My World Cup Reflections

0
Gotta love science on 12:23 - Feb 9 with 798 viewsusm

Gotta love science on 12:21 - Feb 9 by Keno

does this mean we can do Warp Drive yet?


Im booked onto the first flight to Naboo

FOYSC
Poll: Did Broad just get a hat trick without realising ?

1
Gotta love science on 12:35 - Feb 9 with 769 viewsTrequartista

Lynn, that’s hotter than the sun!

Poll: Who do you blame for our failure to progress?

1
Gotta love science on 12:52 - Feb 9 with 734 viewsKentish_Tractor

What happens to all the helium it will generate? Are we all going to be walking around with squeeky voices?

But seriously, would a massive amount of helium mess with the atmosphere?
[Post edited 9 Feb 2022 12:52]

Poll: Assume we have the money for one more big signing. Where do you spend it?

0
Gotta love science on 13:17 - Feb 9 with 685 viewsParsley

Gotta love science on 12:52 - Feb 9 by Kentish_Tractor

What happens to all the helium it will generate? Are we all going to be walking around with squeeky voices?

But seriously, would a massive amount of helium mess with the atmosphere?
[Post edited 9 Feb 2022 12:52]


Helium supply has been quite unstable and expensive recently so might actually be beneficial
0
Gotta love science on 13:33 - Feb 9 with 658 viewsitfc_bucks

Gotta love science on 12:52 - Feb 9 by Kentish_Tractor

What happens to all the helium it will generate? Are we all going to be walking around with squeeky voices?

But seriously, would a massive amount of helium mess with the atmosphere?
[Post edited 9 Feb 2022 12:52]


I used to work there. Helium scarcity is becoming a big thing, so a clean source of it would be an amazing by-product.

The scale of this breakthrough cannot be overstated. This is a moon-landing scale change for us as a species.
0
Gotta love science on 14:07 - Feb 9 with 614 viewsGuthrum

There's two questions regarding that: Was it an energy surplus (i.e. gatting out more than they put in) - which would be a major achievement - and, if so, what proportion of the total energy input does that represent?

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Login to get fewer ads

Gotta love science on 14:28 - Feb 9 with 599 viewsitfc_bucks

Gotta love science on 14:07 - Feb 9 by Guthrum

There's two questions regarding that: Was it an energy surplus (i.e. gatting out more than they put in) - which would be a major achievement - and, if so, what proportion of the total energy input does that represent?


So, the answer is that we're still not at breakeven - best efforts is that we're approx 10 units of energy in to get 7 back, but it's effectively a question of volume and scale now, hence the next version Tokamak being built in Caderache now - it's bloody huge!

The next challenge is to not just generate more energy than it costs to operate, it's to generate *usable* energy, ie energy that can be used to drive a turbine and create electricity.

It won't come online in the next couple of years, but the next decade or so looks tough, but achieveable.
1
Gotta love science on 14:36 - Feb 9 with 575 viewsKeno

Gotta love science on 14:07 - Feb 9 by Guthrum

There's two questions regarding that: Was it an energy surplus (i.e. gatting out more than they put in) - which would be a major achievement - and, if so, what proportion of the total energy input does that represent?


"Was it an energy surplus (i.e. gatting out more than they put in)"

Is Mike eating it?

[Post edited 9 Feb 2022 14:37]

Poll: At which of our last 10 games will be confirm EPL survival?
Blog: [Blog] My World Cup Reflections

0
Gotta love science on 14:37 - Feb 9 with 572 viewsCotty

Awesome video.
0
Gotta love science on 14:38 - Feb 9 with 566 viewsCotty

Gotta love science on 12:19 - Feb 9 by blueasfook

This process requires huge amounts of heat though. (100 million degrees to be exact).

The true holy grail of cheap abundant energy is cold fusion - which we are still some way off achieving.


Cold fusion is mostly quackery/tinfoil hat stuff. Yes hot fusion is hot, but if you can figure out how to get it to be self-sustaining then you're in flavour country.
0
Gotta love science on 14:40 - Feb 9 with 563 viewsCotty

Gotta love science on 12:52 - Feb 9 by Kentish_Tractor

What happens to all the helium it will generate? Are we all going to be walking around with squeeky voices?

But seriously, would a massive amount of helium mess with the atmosphere?
[Post edited 9 Feb 2022 12:52]


If you let it go, it leaves the atmostphere pretty quick smart. But actually there's a big shortage, it's used in MRI scanners etc, so this would be a good byproduct to have.
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025