By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Back again? Dear oh dear. on 08:18 - Oct 13 by StokieBlue
Last night they were trying to write it off as a "verbal tick" which he uses when he wants to move the conversation along.
Either way the optics are awful.
SB
Someone I worked with back in the 80's had a nervous laugh when they were embarrassed or asked an awkward question. When a colleague told us his wife had cancer she giggled. The optics, as you say, were awful.
Don't believe a word I say. I'm only kidding. Or am I?
Back again? Dear oh dear. on 08:18 - Oct 13 by StokieBlue
Last night they were trying to write it off as a "verbal tick" which he uses when he wants to move the conversation along.
Either way the optics are awful.
SB
I might be naïve here…and believe me I really want it to be as withering a reaction to her presence as it initially seems…but she’s speaking over a few of his words (which you’d hope would be high treason in itself) when she says “lovely to see you again”, and doesn’t it sound a bit like he might be saying something like “sorry to bring you back again…dear oh dear”? Which if accurate would rather change the tone…
0
Back again? Dear oh dear. on 10:24 - Oct 13 with 1009 views
Back again? Dear oh dear. on 08:35 - Oct 13 by Oldsmoker
Someone I worked with back in the 80's had a nervous laugh when they were embarrassed or asked an awkward question. When a colleague told us his wife had cancer she giggled. The optics, as you say, were awful.
Back again? Dear oh dear. on 10:05 - Oct 13 by FoghornGleghorn
I might be naïve here…and believe me I really want it to be as withering a reaction to her presence as it initially seems…but she’s speaking over a few of his words (which you’d hope would be high treason in itself) when she says “lovely to see you again”, and doesn’t it sound a bit like he might be saying something like “sorry to bring you back again…dear oh dear”? Which if accurate would rather change the tone…
I think it goes in the opposite direction, are these meetings usually filmed ? I know the meat of these talks remain private but to even disclose the introduction seems odd. In other words this smacks of a leak, but by who ? Disgruntled Conservatives who want to see Truss gone or, and I hardly dare type this, a friend of the Monarch who is privy to a deep dissatisfaction about the refusal to attend CoP27...
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
