| Both Preston's front boys would be good! 13:02 - Jan 21 with 1483 views | Nutkins_Return |
Keane and Emil Riis Jacobson. Working hard, both good size and both decent scoring records. |  |
| |  |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 13:06 - Jan 21 with 1449 views | Exiled2Surrey |
Their GK looks good as well... | | | |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 13:06 - Jan 21 with 1449 views | MK1 |
And both come with a healthy price tag. 1 is possible, but both is wishful thinking. |  |
| |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 13:08 - Jan 21 with 1431 views | Nutkins_Return |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 13:06 - Jan 21 by MK1 |
And both come with a healthy price tag. 1 is possible, but both is wishful thinking. |
I should have phrased as either. Though would take both :) | |
| |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 13:27 - Jan 21 with 1368 views | Vaughan8 |
I didn't rate Keane when he was here before. However totally different set up now.
I might be in the minority but still wouldn't be keen (pun intended). I don't know much about the other guy.
EDIT:-however we are getting a bit desperate so he's probably better than what we've got.....! [Post edited 21 Jan 2024 13:30]
| | | |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 13:39 - Jan 21 with 1288 views | Nutkins_Return |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 13:27 - Jan 21 by Vaughan8 |
I didn't rate Keane when he was here before. However totally different set up now.
I might be in the minority but still wouldn't be keen (pun intended). I don't know much about the other guy.
EDIT:-however we are getting a bit desperate so he's probably better than what we've got.....! [Post edited 21 Jan 2024 13:30]
|
Keane was a rare bright light in those dark times. Quality player. Was gutted when he went. You could see he was a class ahead of what we had. Fitness was his drawback back then. That's fine away. Only negative I can see now is his age.
I've realised I was confusing Jacobson for Frokjaer in this match. Frokjaer is a good player though not what we need. Jacobson not been great | |
| |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 13:39 - Jan 21 with 1288 views | Vaughan8 |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 13:06 - Jan 21 by Exiled2Surrey |
Their GK looks good as well... |
Just realised who it is (only started watching at 70 mins!)
Almost dropped one in his own net and a few dodgy kicks out in 10 mins! haha | | | |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 13:49 - Jan 21 with 1213 views | gainsboroughblue |
Preston just launching it long now and ball keeps coming back. |  |
| |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 13:51 - Jan 21 with 1201 views | Vaughan8 |
On another note,
Is the rule at Elland Road that Leeds get every 50:50 decision and obvious yellow cards for them dont get given.
....... | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 14:05 - Jan 21 with 1102 views | NthQldITFC |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 13:06 - Jan 21 by Exiled2Surrey |
Their GK looks good as well... |
To be honest, I thought he was absolutely terrible, but the swirly wind made it difficult for both keepers, I suppose. |  |
| |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 15:58 - Jan 21 with 955 views | Exiled2Surrey |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 14:05 - Jan 21 by NthQldITFC |
To be honest, I thought he was absolutely terrible, but the swirly wind made it difficult for both keepers, I suppose. |
Didn’t watch the game - just saw the team list and thought that he must have made decent progress since his time as back up for Holy! | | | |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 19:01 - Jan 21 with 807 views | Nutkins_Return |
| Both Preston's front boys would be good! on 14:05 - Jan 21 by NthQldITFC |
To be honest, I thought he was absolutely terrible, but the swirly wind made it difficult for both keepers, I suppose. |
Think that's a whoosh. It's Dai Cornell | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
