| So what do we think the finer details are? 19:22 - May 29 with 2045 views | ghostofescobar |
More cheese in the changing room? Platform boots for Chappers? Burns growing his hair back? KM being allowed to wear something other than a black top with a half zip, grey trousers and black trainers with a white sole? Pert legally obliged to keep his top on, no matter what the celebrations? What do we think? |  |
| |  |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 19:25 - May 29 with 1995 views | Illinoisblue |
Burns has to do the Griddy last home game of the season in perpetuity |  |
| |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 19:27 - May 29 with 1983 views | WeWereZombies |
Being serious for once, an adequate transfer kitty...bigger than Brighton were offering... |  |
| |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 19:38 - May 29 with 1918 views | WicklowBlue |
Pure speculation, but upgrading hobnobs in his office to these:
The delay is due to a supplier shortage in Suffolk due to contractual issues with an existing customer allegedly named Ham&Co. Plc. |  | | |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 19:42 - May 29 with 1899 views | wkj |
I heard that KM expects Aston to ensure that there is a shop in town that sells black zip up tops, dark jeans and white soled shoes exclusively. Ashton originally offered an option on the Foxhall road roundabout but apparently McKenna's agents was expecting the ToysRUs building. |  |
| |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 19:43 - May 29 with 1893 views | Zx1988 |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 19:27 - May 29 by WeWereZombies |
Being serious for once, an adequate transfer kitty...bigger than Brighton were offering... |
If the attempted acquisition of Omari forms part of the deal, perhaps the precise details of the parameters within which Town will seek to do business, and the levels beyond which the club can say no. |  |
| |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 19:44 - May 29 with 1882 views | Illinoisblue |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 19:43 - May 29 by Zx1988 |
If the attempted acquisition of Omari forms part of the deal, perhaps the precise details of the parameters within which Town will seek to do business, and the levels beyond which the club can say no. |
It would be a weird contrast that featured guarantees of transfer ambitions. | |
| |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 19:46 - May 29 with 1869 views | Zx1988 |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 19:44 - May 29 by Illinoisblue |
It would be a weird contrast that featured guarantees of transfer ambitions. |
Fair point. I suppose guarantees of certain budgets and input would have the same effect. | |
| |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 20:02 - May 29 with 1807 views | WicklowBlue |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 19:43 - May 29 by Zx1988 |
If the attempted acquisition of Omari forms part of the deal, perhaps the precise details of the parameters within which Town will seek to do business, and the levels beyond which the club can say no. |
I don't think any lawyer on the planet would expose the club to such conditions.
I'd expect it's down to specifics on bonus payments, targets met based on league results, relegation, release clauses, payments if the club release him from duties (see PRP and Potter for examples) and a lot of other minutiae the legal bods are discussing. Interpretations of terms such as "in good faith/standing" etc etc
With a big new contract both McK and ITFC will want it all water tight to protect each sides interests. The legal bods on both sides will be working overtime for their clients.
Not related at all, but kinda... in Ireland it takes on average 6 months to buy a house. I know in the US and UK you can close in about 3 weeks. Most of the delay in Ireland is due to solicitors and contracts. (Which I'm currently experiencing) | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 20:04 - May 29 with 1790 views | blueislander |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 19:46 - May 29 by Zx1988 |
Fair point. I suppose guarantees of certain budgets and input would have the same effect. |
It is most unlikely to be anything of substance, probably matters of language and syntax. Many times in my professional life I have despaired of lawyers, and their ability to prevaricate and complicate. | | | |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 20:11 - May 29 with 1760 views | WicklowBlue |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 20:04 - May 29 by blueislander |
It is most unlikely to be anything of substance, probably matters of language and syntax. Many times in my professional life I have despaired of lawyers, and their ability to prevaricate and complicate. |
Find and replace Keiron with Keiran over 2000 pages. Irish names!!!  | | | |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 20:13 - May 29 with 1746 views | blueislander |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 20:11 - May 29 by WicklowBlue |
Find and replace Keiron with Keiran over 2000 pages. Irish names!!! |
It really could be something as banal as that>>. | | | |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 20:15 - May 29 with 1718 views | SmithersJones |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 20:11 - May 29 by WicklowBlue |
Find and replace Keiron with Keiran over 2000 pages. Irish names!!! |
And then do it all over again to change it to Kieran | | | |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 20:42 - May 29 with 1648 views | WicklowBlue |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 20:15 - May 29 by SmithersJones |
And then do it all over again to change it to Kieran |
Dammit!!!! 
Thank you for the correction. | | | |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 20:57 - May 29 with 1581 views | SuperKieranMcKenna |
I hope it doesn’t cover trademarking of ‘Super Kieran McKenna’ and improper use of said trademark. | | | |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 21:51 - May 29 with 1492 views | ArchiRob |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 20:04 - May 29 by blueislander |
It is most unlikely to be anything of substance, probably matters of language and syntax. Many times in my professional life I have despaired of lawyers, and their ability to prevaricate and complicate. |
Just try suing one for incompetence,. |  |
| |
| So what do we think the finer details are? on 01:55 - May 30 with 1334 views | IPS_wich |
It's an employment contract so it can only really be a small number of things. I'm not an HR expert or lawyer, but I have had to negotiate 2-3 times for significant contracts (mostly focused on bonuses and anti-compete clauses if I chose to leave) - so I would suggest the sticking point falls into one of the following categories:
- Remuneration: including salary, bonuses and penalties (i.e. what bonuses are triggered, what deductions/reductions there may be for relegation), and escalation clauses such as inflation or length of service
- Fringe Benefits: including leave allowance, cars, assisted travel, matchday tickets for friends and family (the list could be endless)
- Performance related inclusions not related to remuneration: could include things like triggers for extensions, thresholds of poor performance that could see the contract terminated
- Termination/resignation clauses: what he would be paid out if the club sacked him, what restrictions or penalties may apply if he chooses to leave, what compensation the club would get if he left for another club
- Breach of contract by the employer: that being things that the employer could do or has to do in order for the employee to reasonably do their job; which is where things like minimum transfer budget could come in
- Breach of contract by the employee: things that McKenna can and can't do without being in breach of contract, could include things like speaking to other clubs without ITFC's permission
- Change in organisational ownership: could include some provisions about what would happen if Gamechanger sold the club or a substantial stake in the club.
At the end of the day it's important to remember that the contract is between two parties, so it could equally be the club who are holding things up because they are insisting on terms that are unacceptable to McKenna - just as much vice versa. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
