| Northern Bypass Plans Recommended To Be Scrapped 16:02 - Jan 30 with 4068 views | geg1992 |
Wahhhhh [Post edited 30 Jan 2020 16:03]
|  |
| |  |
| Northern Bypass Plans Recommended To Be Scrapped on 21:12 - Jan 30 with 641 views | Lord_Lucan |
| Northern Bypass Plans Recommended To Be Scrapped on 20:43 - Jan 30 by Trequartista |
The other three quarters of the bypass built 35 years ago, and incorporating a national freight route, has not been jammed by its infill. It flows freely when there are not incidents and accidents even incorporating a major freight route.
Is there anyone who thought building the bypass that currently exists was a bad idea? Can you imagine what it would be like if it hadn't have been built? |
Exactly this. |  |
| |
| Northern Bypass Plans Recommended To Be Scrapped on 23:59 - Jan 30 with 600 views | Pinewoodblue |
| Northern Bypass Plans Recommended To Be Scrapped on 21:12 - Jan 30 by Lord_Lucan |
Exactly this. |
Don’t they have to build that number of houses anyway? |  |
| |
| Northern Bypass Plans Recommended To Be Scrapped on 00:04 - Jan 31 with 597 views | bournemouthblue |
| Northern Bypass Plans Recommended To Be Scrapped on 16:24 - Jan 30 by flimflam |
Should of built a tunnel instead of a bridge. |
That assumes it is winds which close it but in reality a lot of accidents occur and shut it down quite regularly, along with 'incidents'.
I believe only 4500 people took the consultation so whether it is even fit for purpose has to be questioned
I believe the local working zone between Ipswich Felixstowe Harwich Woodbridge Clacton Colchester Hadleigh etc is around 600k people
Can 4500 people really decide this, around 3000 of which are from North of Ipswich I believe
The actual consultation proved quite predictably that people in the Northern Areas were strongly against the Bypass whilst people in Ipswich were strongly for it [Post edited 31 Jan 2020 0:10]
|  |
| |
| Northern Bypass Plans Recommended To Be Scrapped on 00:10 - Jan 31 with 597 views | Lord_Lucan |
| Northern Bypass Plans Recommended To Be Scrapped on 23:59 - Jan 30 by Pinewoodblue |
Don’t they have to build that number of houses anyway? |
I don't know. Frankly I haven't been following it very closely as I knew it wouldn't happen.
In any case I would welcome an enlargement of Greater Ipswich. | |
| |
| Northern Bypass Plans Recommended To Be Scrapped on 08:15 - Jan 31 with 521 views | itfcjoe |
Personally I'm for as much investment into my hometown as possible, why i was disappointed the bridge thing got shelved by Sandy Martin because it was obvious we'd end up with nothing and here we are - quelle surprise.
It might not be exactly what we need or needed, but it brings it's benefits for the local economy and community.
I'm in construction, so can't ever really complain about development - but we see it all the time where people who have already benefitted from it pull the ladder up behind them.
The difference between a conservationist and a developer is that a developer wants to build a house in the woods, whereas a conservationist already has one. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
