By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Think of what they had to lose if they were found guilty of negligence that resulted in her death. They would both serve time in prison. They would both lose their well paid jobs. The twins would have been taken into care. This isn't proof but it is a powerful motive to cover up her death.
Cadaver dogs are very reliable especially the one's used in the McCann case. Can you provide a source that states cadaver dogs aren't very reliable?
Would an abductor be able to enter an apartment without being seen or heard? Take a child from its bed without waking it? Spend time opening up the window then the shutter then climbing out without leaving a single trace of evidence behind?. Then leave the resort again without being seen or heard?
[Post edited 5 Jun 2020 0:06]
The Police are following the line of abduction, so they must have some evidence of one.
It is only discredited by the McCann's & Clarence Mitchell. The MSM have mainly just printed the spin Clarence Mitchell has given them.
I think it is far more credible than the abduction theory yes. This is what Kate McCann said in her statement to the police when she discovered Maddie was missing. I will paraphrase it to shorten.
'I went in to the apartment and walked up to the bedroom door. The door wasn't closed over we left it ajar to let some light in . I went to open it fully but the door suddenly slammed shut. I opened it and peered in. It took a while for my eyes to adjust to the light. All of a sudden there was a whooshing sound and the curtains flapped wildly, thats when I realised the bedroom shutter and window were open. I then noticed Madeleine was not in her bed. I looked around the apartment to see if she was hiding but she was not there. I immediately thought they have taken her. I ran out out of the apartment and over to the Tapas bar to Gerry.'
Now a couple of things, if a door suddenly slammed shut would you not immediately investigate what made the door slam shut? Turn the light on and immediately look at the window. She only realised the window was open due to the gush of wind remember. According to readings from the local airport there was no strong winds that particular night it was very calm.
'Also I immediately thought they have taken her' Firstly who is 'they'!? And why would that be your first thought? Surely your first thought would be Maddie must have woken up and called for us and when no one came she got up to look for us. The patio door was left unlocked or so they claim, is it not possible she could have wondered out of the apartment looking for them? Secondly they had twins who were no more than a year old. Would you really leave two young children like that alone to run to the Tapas bar if you believed your other child was abducted? Remember she said the bedroom window was open. It over looked the Tapas bar which was only 50 meters away as the crow flies. Would it not make more sense to call for Gerry from the window?
In both their initial statements they stated the 'abducter' must have forced the shutter open and that is how they got in through the window. The Police discovered it was not possible to force the shutters open from the outside they could only be opened from the inside using the mechanism. There was also no evidence that someone even tried to force it open.(no dents or scratches) when they learnt of this from the police they then stated the intruder must have got via the patio door as they left it unlocked(yes like you do when you have got young kids!) Then opened up the shutter and window to the bedroom to make his escape with Maddie that way even though there is a clear line of sight from that window to the Tapas bar.
Oh and one other thing if you look at the crime scene photos of the bedroom. The bed is pressed right against one side of the curtains and a chair is pressed right against another side. There is no way the curtains could have violently blown in like she claimed.
[Post edited 4 Jun 2020 22:42]
The point about the door slamming shut. If the bedroom window was open and she had the front door open when she entered the apartment, it will cause a higher pressure than what was in the apartment before she opened the front door. This higher pressure will want to escape out of the nearest exit, which would of been the front door. It would have to travel past the bedroom door first, causing it to shut. Then opening it again will cause that air to come back into the apartment again flapping the curtains.
In regards to the cadaver dogs i know a professional dog trainer. We have had a conversation in the past about the use of them in the McCann case. I can only say what they have told me. They say that these dogs are good but there is one big drawback. Two of the chemicals given off by dead bodies are also found in human saliva and rotting organic material.
The point about the door slamming shut. If the bedroom window was open and she had the front door open when she entered the apartment, it will cause a higher pressure than what was in the apartment before she opened the front door. This higher pressure will want to escape out of the nearest exit, which would of been the front door. It would have to travel past the bedroom door first, causing it to shut. Then opening it again will cause that air to come back into the apartment again flapping the curtains.
In regards to the cadaver dogs i know a professional dog trainer. We have had a conversation in the past about the use of them in the McCann case. I can only say what they have told me. They say that these dogs are good but there is one big drawback. Two of the chemicals given off by dead bodies are also found in human saliva and rotting organic material.
[Post edited 5 Jun 2020 21:18]
It's not that there isn't a possible explanation for the door slamming its more the fact she doesn't look straight away to see if the window in the bedroom is open. It would be most people's first reaction. It's at the 35 the minute point in the video below.
As for the Cadaver dogs only one of them(eddie) was actually trained to detect cadaver odour the other one Keela was trained to sniff out the smallest samples of blood even off items that have been washed several times. See the various articles about these two dogs prior to the McCann case in the link below. They are both truly remarkable.
Edit: the the link for the YouTube video is not working. Search RIchard D hall in YouTube then under his videos look for McCann's Embedded Confessions part 2
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
