Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? 12:55 - Mar 21 with 643 views factual_blue Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter?
Your Vote: You need to be logged in to vote on our site polls
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:06 - Mar 21 with 616 viewsYou_Bloo_Right No "Battenberg" option?
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:10 - Mar 21 with 612 viewsWD19 Which responses would give pink and yellow segments on the graph?
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:11 - Mar 21 with 611 viewsMattinLondon Battenberg is lovely. If any food or drink is to be deemed abusive than ‘real ale’ or ‘bitter’ is more fitting.
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:24 - Mar 21 with 593 viewswkj Battenberg is awful, but much less offensive to the taste buds than day old Madera.
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:26 - Mar 21 with 587 viewswkj Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:11 - Mar 21 by MattinLondon Battenberg is lovely. If any food or drink is to be deemed abusive than ‘real ale’ or ‘bitter’ is more fitting.
I do think that Ghostship is horrific if that helps.
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:34 - Mar 21 with 581 viewsBasingstokeBlue Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:06 - Mar 21 by You_Bloo_Right No "Battenberg" option?
Go Battenberg yourself.
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 14:09 - Mar 21 with 564 viewshoppy No, because that would be giving it some kind of recognition, which it doesn’t deserve.
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 14:31 - Mar 21 with 558 viewsGeoffSentence Would it appease you if we called it Mountbatten cake?
Login to get fewer adsShould 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 15:25 - Mar 21 with 539 viewsfactual_blue Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 14:31 - Mar 21 by GeoffSentence Would it appease you if we called it Mountbatten cake?
No. Just ban it.
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 21:28 - Mar 21 with 485 viewsronnyd Love it.
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 21:37 - Mar 21 with 478 viewsEwan_Oozami Careful Facters, I'll get the "phantom" on to you...