| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? 14:12 - May 1 with 946 views | earlsgreenblue |
Logic says we play our own for a multitude of reasons, but just maybe his loan requirements are such that a certain number of games does void an expensive trigger?
Guessing, so tell me other reasons please. |  | | |  |
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:14 - May 1 with 909 views | IpswichKnight |
Think that is exactly right. We want to keep in favour with Arsenal for the future too. | | | |
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:15 - May 1 with 896 views | gordon |
Phil said ages ago that there were usually contractual agreements regarding the loan players like this, I'm surprised it could be a big enough penalty (given the apparent wealth of the new owners) for it to be an issue to the current owners.
I guess if Nsiala and Chambers are both leaving as well then what odds does it make to Cook which one of the three starts with Woolfenden, who presumably isn't leaving? |  | | |
| Phil confirmed that he has already passed any..... on 14:16 - May 1 with 877 views | Bloots |
....stipulated number of games that we had to play him in.
There is literally no explanation as to why he's playing. |  |
| "Great to see you back on here mate, I was considering deactivating my account if you hadn’t returned" - TWTD User (Aug 2025) |
| |
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:17 - May 1 with 864 views | IpswichKnight |
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:15 - May 1 by gordon |
Phil said ages ago that there were usually contractual agreements regarding the loan players like this, I'm surprised it could be a big enough penalty (given the apparent wealth of the new owners) for it to be an issue to the current owners.
I guess if Nsiala and Chambers are both leaving as well then what odds does it make to Cook which one of the three starts with Woolfenden, who presumably isn't leaving? |
Think it’s more about keeping Arsenal on side they would be reluctant to send anyone our way if we break the agreements. | | | |
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:17 - May 1 with 858 views | Mookamoo |
If we want to be considered as a potential place for decent loans next season we have to be seen as a place they can get games. I imagine we have our eye on someone who is also represented by McGuiness' agent. |  | | |
| Phil confirmed that he has already passed any..... on 14:21 - May 1 with 822 views | urbanblue |
| Phil confirmed that he has already passed any..... on 14:16 - May 1 by Bloots |
....stipulated number of games that we had to play him in.
There is literally no explanation as to why he's playing. |
Unless we are going to sign him?
Please no ... |  | | |
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:23 - May 1 with 785 views | J2BLUE |
The most logical explanation is Chambers and Toto are off. Woolf is staying. if McGuiness gets injured he's back at Arsenal anyway. |  |
| |
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:24 - May 1 with 751 views | gtsb1966 |
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:23 - May 1 by J2BLUE |
The most logical explanation is Chambers and Toto are off. Woolf is staying. if McGuiness gets injured he's back at Arsenal anyway. |
Couldn't agree more. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:25 - May 1 with 749 views | chrismakin |
Could have a high unused fee within the agreement. No point spending money for no reason. Etc |  |
| |
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:27 - May 1 with 711 views | gordon |
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:23 - May 1 by J2BLUE |
The most logical explanation is Chambers and Toto are off. Woolf is staying. if McGuiness gets injured he's back at Arsenal anyway. |
Yes, this makes sense. Would hope to see Baggott in one of the last two games, at least off the bench. | | | |
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:28 - May 1 with 693 views | chrismakin |
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:27 - May 1 by gordon |
Yes, this makes sense. Would hope to see Baggott in one of the last two games, at least off the bench. |
He cant can he?
Isnt he on loan at KL and altho he can play for u18s hes not allowed first team football? | |
| |
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:29 - May 1 with 690 views | MillsTash |
Phil has clarified this before. He had a clause related to appearances which has been passed a while ago. |  | | |
| Phil confirmed that he has already passed any..... on 14:32 - May 1 with 655 views | Fixed_It |
| Phil confirmed that he has already passed any..... on 14:16 - May 1 by Bloots |
....stipulated number of games that we had to play him in.
There is literally no explanation as to why he's playing. |
Apart from being viewed favourably by Arsenal as a destination for players going out on loan. |  |
| |
| McGuinness potential reasons for starting? on 14:44 - May 1 with 594 views | Wickets |
I would not be surprised to see him at the club next season . |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
