| Yet again 00:26 - Jul 12 with 5040 views | waveneyblue |
A bunch on here that are reveling in English bashing, aren't we scum, what has this nation become blah blah blah...
Like ALL countries we have a minority problem who are knuckle head, racist, idiotic scum.
But for christ sake, it's a MINORITY, the majority of this country are decent people who contrary to belief act properly and take responsibility for their actions.
Seriously I'm surprised some of you on here don't become MPs, or church leaders as clearly you are people we should all look up to.
I suspect to get knocked for this, but surely there are people who like me are sick to death of the holier than though attitude that seems to prevail on here. [Post edited 12 Jul 2021 0:30]
|  | | |  |
| Yet again on 19:39 - Jul 12 with 499 views | Ewan_Oozami |
| Yet again on 19:34 - Jul 12 by Timefliesbyintheblue |
I agree wholeheartedly. I was just trying to highlight the recent tendency on the forum that sarcastically pulls folk up for spelling or grammar indiscretions. Though rather than thou did not distract from the posters point he was putting across. |
You missed out an apostrophe in "poster's".... |  |
| |
| Yet again on 20:00 - Jul 12 with 467 views | Enigma_Blue |
| Yet again on 19:30 - Jul 12 by HARRY10 |
Waveney is a scummer, so I have been reliably informed
I would treat him accordingly (ignore) |
"I would treat him accordingly (ignore)"
Says the guy who replied to him.  |  | | |
| Yet again on 20:28 - Jul 12 with 428 views | waveneyblue |
| Yet again on 19:30 - Jul 12 by HARRY10 |
Waveney is a scummer, so I have been reliably informed
I would treat him accordingly (ignore) |
Wow - that's my favourite response so far -
I can assure you 100% that I am not a scummer and I strongly recommend you change your informer.
Have a look back at my posts for the last (god knows how many) years you absolute tool. | | | |
| Yet again on 20:33 - Jul 12 with 412 views | Ewan_Oozami |
| Yet again on 20:28 - Jul 12 by waveneyblue |
Wow - that's my favourite response so far -
I can assure you 100% that I am not a scummer and I strongly recommend you change your informer.
Have a look back at my posts for the last (god knows how many) years you absolute tool. |
Triggered... | |
| |
| Yet again on 20:35 - Jul 12 with 406 views | waveneyblue |
Eh ? I get called a scummer, I respond and that's triggered ?
I really need to read the rules of this site again | | | |
| Yet again on 20:40 - Jul 12 with 385 views | 26_Paz |
| Yet again on 19:30 - Jul 12 by HARRY10 |
Waveney is a scummer, so I have been reliably informed
I would treat him accordingly (ignore) |
So what if he was? Why is that relevant to this conversation? |  |
| |
| Yet again on 20:42 - Jul 12 with 383 views | Ewan_Oozami |
| Yet again on 20:35 - Jul 12 by waveneyblue |
Eh ? I get called a scummer, I respond and that's triggered ?
I really need to read the rules of this site again |
Lots of TWTD rules are unwritten...you'd better be careful otherwise you'll get your head nailed to the floor.... | |
| |
| Yet again on 20:45 - Jul 12 with 370 views | Double_Dutch |
| Yet again on 19:30 - Jul 12 by HARRY10 |
Waveney is a scummer, so I have been reliably informed
I would treat him accordingly (ignore) |
On another thread, you have accused another poster of lying and, requested that said poster back up their own claim with evidence, which I believe the poster has provided on the original thread as per your request.
Would we be justified in asking you to back up your assertion that Waveney is in your words, a scummer? |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
