Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Don’t forget it’s still lateral flow test proof for the Oldham game 21:23 - Nov 5 with 4168 viewsunstableblue

For those without vaccination proof


https://www.itfc.co.uk/news/2021/november/matchday-guide-oldham/



Poll: How do you rate the new home kit out of 5?

0
Get well soon Grandad Footers!!! xx (n/t) on 20:23 - Nov 7 with 512 viewsfooters

Get well soon Grandad Footers!!! xx (n/t) on 19:49 - Nov 7 by Bloots



Let's hope so.

Just more reason for people to stop and think about what they're doing.

Living in Kessingland, my grandad's pretty isolated, so just imagine what you could be doing in a more populated area. Please, don't think about you, think about others. I don't want you to go through what I have today - it's just common sense.

I might be about to lose someone I love dearly and who has been an absolute institution in Lowestoft. Don't let that die because 'I don't want to wear a mask, hur dur' - it's silly. These are people we're talking about.

Dear old footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Liberator of Vichy TWTD
Poll: Battle of the breakfast potato... who wins?

6
But you appear to be.... on 09:23 - Nov 8 with 390 viewsThe_Flashing_Smile

But you appear to be.... on 13:38 - Nov 6 by StokieBlue

Many thanks for the advice.

I'll leave you something to ponder.....

Not challenging things which are clearly false and sometimes dangerous is the route which lead is to Trump, Brexit, Anti-vax and a whole host of other problems in the world today.

I'm looking forward to the day when you use your vast intellect to help ensure these type of things don't happen in the future.

SB


You do this when it suits though. I was challenging something which has no evidence the other day - the idea that Norwood has a poor attitude to training and fitness - and you were quite happy to join the pile-on against me in that instance.

Pile-on - tick
Emotion rather than facts - tick

Seems you don't like it when it's against you though. Utter hypocrisy.
For the hard of thinking (because I know certain posters are itching to jump on this) - I'm not saying this is equivalent to Covid issues. Just the principle.

Same as you Stokie, I was only on the side of facts and truth.

Trust the process. Trust Phil.

0
But you appear to be.... on 10:24 - Nov 8 with 364 viewsStokieBlue

But you appear to be.... on 09:23 - Nov 8 by The_Flashing_Smile

You do this when it suits though. I was challenging something which has no evidence the other day - the idea that Norwood has a poor attitude to training and fitness - and you were quite happy to join the pile-on against me in that instance.

Pile-on - tick
Emotion rather than facts - tick

Seems you don't like it when it's against you though. Utter hypocrisy.
For the hard of thinking (because I know certain posters are itching to jump on this) - I'm not saying this is equivalent to Covid issues. Just the principle.

Same as you Stokie, I was only on the side of facts and truth.


I posted twice on that thread, both about "character" and both in a light-hearted way. I am not sure you can separate character into off-field and on-field character in the way you were doing - it's all character.

I wasn't saying you have issues or being insulting or aggressive.

This thread is people not wanting to be challenged on their views, saying I have issues and that I should leave the board.

To call than at equivalence is a huge stretch in my opinion.

SB
0
But you appear to be.... on 11:26 - Nov 8 with 327 viewsThe_Flashing_Smile

But you appear to be.... on 10:24 - Nov 8 by StokieBlue

I posted twice on that thread, both about "character" and both in a light-hearted way. I am not sure you can separate character into off-field and on-field character in the way you were doing - it's all character.

I wasn't saying you have issues or being insulting or aggressive.

This thread is people not wanting to be challenged on their views, saying I have issues and that I should leave the board.

To call than at equivalence is a huge stretch in my opinion.

SB


Whether it was light-hearted or not, it came on the back of a pile-on when all I was doing was what you espouse - establishing facts.

Rather than simply hold your hands up and say fair point, you've tried to wriggle just as much as you accuse false-Covid-info spreaders of doing so. Yes, of course you can separate on-field character from off-field character. There are countless examples of players who are nice as pie off the pitch and absolute sods on it. And you know full well that Norwood being done for drink driving or posting a few inflammatory comments on twitter has no bearing on how well he trains. People have decided he's lazy FFS. Where is the equivalence there?

For what it's worth I agree with you on the Covid stuff, absolutely defend your right to keep posting it (and in fact applaud it), and hope you aren't bullied off the board. I'm with you in the fight for truth, facts, logic and science and I'd be grateful if you backed me up rather than join in with the mob, even if slagging off one of our players seems trivial. If people can't critically assess something like that then they've got no chance with Covid.
[Post edited 8 Nov 2021 11:27]

Trust the process. Trust Phil.

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025